层vs Quickblox Baas比较 [英] layer vs quickblox baas comparison

查看:112
本文介绍了层vs Quickblox Baas比较的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

layer vs quickblox,更好(易于实现,性能特点)

layer vs quickblox , which is better(easier to implement,performance features)

对于消息,语音和视频聊天, 是否需要将parse.com与这些消息传递解决方案一起添加以进行内容存储.

for messages,voip, and video chat, and do I need to add parse.com with those messaging solutions for content storage.

推荐答案

一些区别点是:

  1. Quickblox支持视频和音频通话,图层不支持.
  2. Layer提供了适用于iOS,Android和Javascript&的SDK.统一SDK处于排队状态. Quickblox为iOS,Android和js提供sdk.
  3. 上述所有内容仅适用于客户.如果要控制服务器中的某些功能,则必须使用Rest API.
  4. 图层提供Rest和Websocket API,但Quickblox仅提供rest API.
  5. Quickblox 声明其js SDK可以在node.js服务器上使用.但是我在从node.js服务器连接到聊天时遇到This browser not supported错误.在此处中也指定了相同的错误.这意味着无法使用Quickblox在服务器上的新消息/用户上实时获取通知.
  6. Quickblox免费客户支持很烂(例如,请参见此处(对任何票证均无响应),此处 UIK .
  7. Quickblox提供内部用户管理,layer不提供.但是您可以按照 layer docs 中的定义使用Parse来做到这一点.. li>
  8. 图层具有平台API,可进行批量和系统级操作(例如发送公告),并且还提供相关的参与度分析.
  9. 我还发现这个小图层的功能非常有用. /li>
  1. Quickblox supports video and audio calling, layer doesn't.
  2. Layer provides SDK for iOS, android and Javascript & unity sdk are in queue. Quickblox provides sdk for iOS, android and js.
  3. All the above mentioned are only for client. If you want to control something from your server then you have to use Rest APIs.
  4. Layer provides Rest and Websocket API but Quickblox only provides rest API.
  5. Quickblox states that their js sdk can be used on node.js server. But I was getting This browser not supported error in connecting to chat from node.js server. The same error is also specified here. This means that there is not way to get real time notification on new message/user on your server with Quickblox.
  6. Quickblox free tier customer support sucks (for eg. see here (no response on any ticket), here and here). I found Layer's support very good.
  7. Layer's documentation is too good. Quickblox's is confusing. Also quickblox have no doc describing there basic concepts.
  8. Layer also provides support for UIKs.
  9. Quickblox provides in house user management, layer does not. But you can use Parse to do that as defined in layer docs.
  10. Layer has platform API to bulk and system level actions like sending announcements and they also provide engagement analytics on those.
  11. I also find this small layer's feature very useful.

还有更多区别.我上周刚开始使用聊天Baas.将随着时间更新答案.

There are many more differences. I just started using chat Baas last week. Will update the answer with time.

这篇关于层vs Quickblox Baas比较的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆