如何在使用R进行回归分析时为我的变量设置对比? [英] How to set contrasts for my variable in regression analysis with R?

查看:157
本文介绍了如何在使用R进行回归分析时为我的变量设置对比?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

在编码过程中,我需要更改分配给一个因子的虚拟值.但是,以下代码不起作用.有什么建议吗?

During coding, I need to change the dummy value assigned to a factor. However, the following code does not work. Any suggestion?

test_mx= data.frame(a= c(T,T,T,F,F,F), b= c(1,1,1,0,0,0))
test_mx
      a b
1  TRUE 1
2  TRUE 1
3  TRUE 1
4 FALSE 0
5 FALSE 0
6 FALSE 0

model= glm(b ~ a, data= test_mx, family= "binomial")
summary(model)

model= glm(a ~ b, data= test_mx, family= "binomial")
summary(model)

在这里,我将得到b的系数为47.现在,如果我交换虚拟值,则它应该为-47.然而,这种情况并非如此.

Here I will get the coef for b is 47. Now if I swap the dummy value, it should be -47 then. However, this is not the case.

test_mx2= test_mx
contrasts(test_mx2$a)
      TRUE
FALSE    0
TRUE     1
contrasts(test_mx2$a) = c(1,0)
contrasts(test_mx2$a)
      [,1]
FALSE    1
TRUE     0
model= glm(a ~ b, data= test_mx2, family= "binomial")
summary(model)

b的

系数仍然相同.到底是怎么回事?谢谢.

coef for b is still the same. What is going on? Thanks.

推荐答案

关于您的问题,有几处令人困惑的事情.您同时使用了a ~ bb ~ a,那么您到底在看什么?

There are several confusing things regarding your question. You have used both a ~ b and b ~ a, so what are you looking at exactly?

  • 对比度仅适用于协变量/自变量,因为它与模型矩阵的构建有关;因此,对于a ~ b,应将对比度应用于b,而对于b ~ a,应将对比度应用于a;
  • 对比度仅适用于因子/逻辑变量,不适用于数值变量.因此,除非您将b作为因素,否则您将无法与之形成对比.
  • Contrasts only applies to covariates / independent variables, as it is related to construction of model matrix; So for a ~ b, contrasts should be applied to b, while for b ~ a, contrasts should be applied to a;
  • Contrasts only works for factor / logical variables, rather than numerical variables. So unless you have b as a factor, you can't play contrasts with it.

在不更改数据类型的情况下,很明显只有模型b ~ a才有资格进行进一步讨论.在下面,我将展示如何为a设置对比度.

Without changing data type, it is clear that only a model b ~ a is legitimate for further discussion. In the following, I will show how to set contrasts for a.

方法1:使用glmlm

Method 1: using contrasts argument of glm and lm

我们可以通过glmcontrasts参数(与lm相同)来控制对比处理:

We can control contrasts treatment by the contrasts argument of glm (the same for lm):

## dropping the first factor level (default)
coef(glm(b ~ a, data = test_mx, family = binomial(),
     contrasts = list(a = contr.treatment(n = 2, base = 1))))
#(Intercept)          a2 
#  -24.56607    49.13214 

## dropping the second factor level
coef(glm(b ~ a, data = test_mx, family = binomial(),
     contrasts = list(a = contr.treatment(n = 2, base = 2))))
#(Intercept)          a1 
#   24.56607   -49.13214 

在这里,contr.treatment正在生成对比度矩阵:

Here, contr.treatment is generating a contrasts matrix:

contr.treatment(n = 2, base = 1)
#  2
#1 0
#2 1

contr.treatment(n = 2, base = 2)
#  1
#1 1
#2 0

并将它们传递给glm以有效地更改model.matrix.default的行为.让我们比较两种情况的模型矩阵:

and they are passed to glm to effectively change the behaviour of model.matrix.default. Let's compare the model matrix for two cases:

model.matrix.default( ~ a, test_mx, contrasts.arg =
                     list(a = contr.treatment(n = 2, base = 1)))

#  (Intercept) a2
#1           1  1
#2           1  1
#3           1  1
#4           1  0
#5           1  0
#6           1  0

model.matrix.default( ~ a, test_mx, contrasts.arg =
                     list(a = contr.treatment(n = 2, base = 2)))

#  (Intercept) a1
#1           1  0
#2           1  0
#3           1  0
#4           1  1
#5           1  1
#6           1  1

a的第二列只是01之间的转换,这是您期望的虚拟变量.

The second column for a is just a flip between 0 and 1, which is what you have expected for a dummy variable.

方法2:直接将对比度"属性设置为数据框

我们可以使用Ccontrasts设置对比度"属性(C仅用于设置,但contrasts也可以用于查看):

We can use C or contrasts to set "contrasts" attributes (C is only for setting, but contrasts can be used for viewing as well):

test_mx2 <- test_mx
contrasts(test_mx2$a) <- contr.treatment(n = 2, base = 1)
str(test_mx2)
#'data.frame':  6 obs. of  2 variables:
# $ a: Factor w/ 2 levels "FALSE","TRUE": 2 2 2 1 1 1
#  ..- attr(*, "contrasts")= num [1:2, 1] 0 1
#  .. ..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
#  .. .. ..$ : chr  "FALSE" "TRUE"
#  .. .. ..$ : chr "2"
# $ b: num  1 1 1 0 0 0

test_mx3 <- test_mx
contrasts(test_mx3$a) <- contr.treatment(n = 2, base = 2)
str(test_mx3)
#'data.frame':  6 obs. of  2 variables:
# $ a: Factor w/ 2 levels "FALSE","TRUE": 2 2 2 1 1 1
#  ..- attr(*, "contrasts")= num [1:2, 1] 1 0
#  .. ..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
#  .. .. ..$ : chr  "FALSE" "TRUE"
#  .. .. ..$ : chr "1"
# $ b: num  1 1 1 0 0 0

现在我们可以在不使用contrasts参数的情况下适应glm:

Now we can fit glm without using contrasts argument:

coef(glm(b ~ a, data = test_mx2, family = "binomial"))
#(Intercept)          a2 
#  -24.56607    49.13214 

coef(glm(b ~ a, data = test_mx3, family = "binomial"))
#(Intercept)          a1 
#   24.56607   -49.13214 


方法3:为全局更改设置options("contrasts")


Method 3: setting options("contrasts") for a global change

哈哈哈,@ BenBolker还提到了另一个选项,即设置R的全局选项.对于您的仅涉及两个级别的因子的特定示例,我们可以使用?contr.SAS.

Hahaha, @BenBolker yet mentions another option, which is by setting the global options of R. For your specific example with a factor involving only two levels, we can makes use of ?contr.SAS.

## using R default contrasts options
#$contrasts
#        unordered           ordered 
#"contr.treatment"      "contr.poly" 

coef(glm(b ~ a, data = test_mx, family = "binomial"))
#(Intercept)       aTRUE 
#  -24.56607    49.13214 

options(contrasts = c("contr.SAS", "contr.poly"))
coef(glm(b ~ a, data = test_mx, family = "binomial"))
#(Intercept)      aFALSE 
#   24.56607   -49.13214 

但是我相信Ben只是为了说明这一点而已.他不会在现实中采取这种方式,因为更改全局选项不利于获得可复制的R代码.

But I believe Ben is just mention this to complete the picture; He will not take this way in reality, as changing global options is not good for getting reproducible R code.

另一个问题是,contr.SAS只会将最后一个因子水平作为参考.在您只有2个级别的情况下,这可以有效地进行翻转".

Another issue is that contr.SAS will just treat the last factor level as reference. In your particular case with only 2 levels, this effectively does the "flipping".

方法4:手动重新编码因子水平

我无意提及这一点,因为它是如此琐碎,但是由于我添加了方法3",因此最好也添加这一点.

I had no intention to mention this as it is so trivial, but since I have added "Method 3", I'd better add this one, too.

test_mx4 <- test_mx
test_mx4$a <- factor(test_mx4$a, levels = c("TRUE", "FALSE"))
coef(glm(b ~ a, data = test_mx4, family = "binomial"))
#(Intercept)       aTRUE 
#  -24.56607    49.13214 

test_mx5 <- test_mx
test_mx5$a <- factor(test_mx5$a, levels = c("FALSE", "TRUE"))
coef(glm(b ~ a, data = test_mx5, family = "binomial"))
#(Intercept)      aFALSE 
#   24.56607   -49.13214 

这篇关于如何在使用R进行回归分析时为我的变量设置对比?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆