LINQ中的Concat/Union表 [英] Concat/Union Tables in LINQ
问题描述
该当前项目更多地是大型项目的概念证明.我有两个表"(如下表所示),CatList
和DogList
,它们具有相同的列结构.我希望能够同时使用Concat
或Union
并使用LINQ
对结果集执行查询.有人告诉我,通过实施interfaces
我将能够实现这些结果.
这是我到目前为止所拥有的:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
System.Console.Write("Hello World\n");
Dog Dog1 = new Dog { name = "A", age = 1 };
Dog Dog2 = new Dog { name = "B", age = 2 };
Cat Cat1 = new Cat { name = "C", age = 3 };
Cat Cat2 = new Cat { name = "D", age = 4 };
List<Dog> DogList = new List<Dog>();
List<Cat> CatList = new List<Cat>();
DogList.Add(Dog1);
DogList.Add(Dog2);
CatList.Add(Cat1);
CatList.Add(Cat2);
var result = DogList
.Concat(CatList);
}
}
public interface iAnimal
{
string name { get; set; }
int age { get; set; }
}
public class Dog :iAnimal
{
public string name { get; set; }
public int age { get; set; }
}
public class Cat:iAnimal
{
public string name { get; set; }
public int age { get; set; }
}
我可以使用System.Console.Write(Dog1.name);
之类的东西来访问任何创建的对象的任何数据成员,因此我认为接口的实现是正确的.为了有效地合并/合并我的列表,需要在LINQ语句中进行哪些更改.
对于C#
和面向对象的编程,我还是比较陌生的,所以请提供适合我的知识水平的答案.
谢谢
编辑 很抱歉,我忘记在当前代码中包含错误消息.
Error 1 'System.Collections.Generic.List<InterfaceTest.Dog>' does not contain a definition for 'Concat' and the best extension method overload 'System.Linq.ParallelEnumerable.Concat<TSource>(System.Linq.ParallelQuery<TSource>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<TSource>)' has some invalid arguments
Error 2 Instance argument: cannot convert from 'System.Collections.Generic.List<InterfaceTest.Dog>' to 'System.Linq.ParallelQuery<InterfaceTest.Cat>'
问题是编译器无法弄清楚通过将List<Dog>
和List<Cat>
连接起来,它应该产生iAnimal
s的集合.默认情况下,它会看到一个List<Dog>
,并且希望以下集合也是Dog
的集合.
您可以通过向Concat
提供通用参数(即
iAnimal
.
var result = DogList.Concat<iAnimal>(CatList);
然后您将得到类型为IEnumerable<iAnimal>
的result
.
如果您停留在.NET 3.5上,则需要类似
var result = DogList.Cast<IAnimal>().Concat(CatList.Cast<IAnimal>());
3.5无法自动将collection of something that inherits iAnimal
转换为collection of iAnimal
.
This current project is more of a proof of concept for a larger project. I have two "tables" (represented as lists below), CatList
and DogList
, that have identical column structure. I wish to be able to Concat
or Union
the two and perform a query on the resulting set using LINQ
. I was told that by implementing interfaces
I would be able to achieve these results.
Here is what I have so far:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
System.Console.Write("Hello World\n");
Dog Dog1 = new Dog { name = "A", age = 1 };
Dog Dog2 = new Dog { name = "B", age = 2 };
Cat Cat1 = new Cat { name = "C", age = 3 };
Cat Cat2 = new Cat { name = "D", age = 4 };
List<Dog> DogList = new List<Dog>();
List<Cat> CatList = new List<Cat>();
DogList.Add(Dog1);
DogList.Add(Dog2);
CatList.Add(Cat1);
CatList.Add(Cat2);
var result = DogList
.Concat(CatList);
}
}
public interface iAnimal
{
string name { get; set; }
int age { get; set; }
}
public class Dog :iAnimal
{
public string name { get; set; }
public int age { get; set; }
}
public class Cat:iAnimal
{
public string name { get; set; }
public int age { get; set; }
}
I can access any of the data members of any of my created objects using something like System.Console.Write(Dog1.name);
, so I THINK my implementation of interfaces is correct. What needs to be changed in my LINQ statement in order to effectively Concat/Union my lists.
I am rather new to C#
and object oriented programming in general, so please cater your answers to suit my knowledge level.
Thanks
EDIT I apologize, as I have forgotten to include the error message I get in my current code.
Error 1 'System.Collections.Generic.List<InterfaceTest.Dog>' does not contain a definition for 'Concat' and the best extension method overload 'System.Linq.ParallelEnumerable.Concat<TSource>(System.Linq.ParallelQuery<TSource>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<TSource>)' has some invalid arguments
Error 2 Instance argument: cannot convert from 'System.Collections.Generic.List<InterfaceTest.Dog>' to 'System.Linq.ParallelQuery<InterfaceTest.Cat>'
The issue is that the compiler can't figure out that by concatenating a List<Dog>
and a List<Cat>
it should produce a collection of iAnimal
s. By default it sees a List<Dog>
and expects the following collection to be a collection of Dog
too.
You can explicitly tell to treat everything as an iAnimal
this by providing the generic parameter to Concat
, i.e.
var result = DogList.Concat<iAnimal>(CatList);
You then get a result
of type IEnumerable<iAnimal>
.
Edit: If you're stuck on .NET 3.5, you'll need something like
var result = DogList.Cast<IAnimal>().Concat(CatList.Cast<IAnimal>());
as 3.5 can't automatically convert collection of something that inherits iAnimal
to collection of iAnimal
.
这篇关于LINQ中的Concat/Union表的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!