在C中没有定义的宏 [英] Macro without definition in C

问题描述

没有定义的宏函数的用途/适用性是什么?

What is the use/applicability of macro function without definition:

#ifndef __SYSCALL
#define __SYSCALL(a, b)
#endif

人们可以在Linux系统的头文件/usr/include/asm/msr.h

One can find this macro in Linux system in header file /usr/include/asm/msr.h

我也注意到以下种类的宏.

I also notice macro of following kind.

#define _M(x) x

我认为可以定义使代码统一的这种宏的唯一原因.就像在 #define SOMETHING(1<< 0)中一样.还有其他隐藏(更好)使用这种宏的方法吗?

And only reason to defined this kind of macro that I can think to make code uniform. like in #define SOMETHING (1 << 0). Is there any other hidden(better) use of this kind of macros?

用示例回答将非常有帮助.还 有人可以给我提供文本/链接来阅读有关此内容的信息.

An answer with example will be very helpful. Also can someone provide me a text/link to read about this.

推荐答案

这种形式的宏的最常见情况之一:

One of the most common case of a macro of this form:

#define _M(x) x

旨在为仅支持C语言的原始K& R方言的编译器提供向后兼容性，而C& R语言方言早于现在流行的ANSI C方言.在该语言的原始K& R语言中，声明函数时未指定函数参数. 1989年，ANSI对语言进行了标准化，并进行了许多改进，包括声明了参数类型的函数原型.

is to provide backwards compatibility for compilers that only supported the original K&R dialect of C, that predated the now-ubiquitous ANSI C dialect. In the original K&R dialect of the language, function arguments were not specified when declaring the function. In 1989, ANSI standardized the language and incorporated a number of improvements, including function prototypes that declared the number of type of arguments.

int f(int x, double y); /* ANSI C. K&R compilers would not accept this */

int f(); /* Function declared in the original K&R dialect */

尽管现在很少或不支持C的原始K& R方言的编译器，但是当需要同时支持两种编译器时，编写了许多软件，而宏提供了一种同时支持这两种编译器的简便方法.仍然有很多头文件提供这种向后兼容性.

While compilers that support the original K&R dialect of C are rare (or extinct) these days, a lot of software was written when both kinds of compilers needed to be supported, and macros provided an easy way to support both. There are still a lot of headers laying about that provide this backwards compatibility.

为了向K& R编译器提供向后兼容性，许多头文件具有以下内容:

To provide backwards compatibility for K&R compilers, many header files have the following:

#if ANSI_PROTOTYPES
#  define _P(x) x
#else
#  define _P(x) ()
#endif

...

int f _P((int x, double y));

如果已经正确设置了ANSI_PROTOTYPES定义(由用户或通过某些先前的#ifdef逻辑)，那么您将获得所需的行为:

If the ANSI_PROTOTYPES definition has been correctly set (either by the user or by some prior #ifdef logic), then you get the desired behavior:

• 如果定义了ANSI_PROTOTYPES，则定义将扩展为int f(int x, double y).
• 如果未定义ANSI_PROTOTYPES，则定义将扩展为int f()

• If ANSI_PROTOTYPES is defined, the definition expands to int f(int x, double y).
• If ANSI_PROTOTYPES is not defined, the definition expands to int f()

这篇关于在C中没有定义的宏的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！