塑料SCM.这是正确的解决方案吗? [英] Plastic SCM. Is it the right solution?

问题描述

我知道有关Plastic SCM的问题已经存在，但是已经存在了一年多.最近有人使用过Plastic SCM吗?您对此有何看法.

I know there are some questions already regarding Plastic SCM, but they are over a year old. Has anyone used Plastic SCM lately? What do you think about it.

我使用过git，目前正在使用汞.我喜欢Hg源代码控制，但是Visual Studio集成不是很好，并且相关的任务/项目管理工具也不是很好.推荐使用Plastic SCM，但我希望对此有一个共同的看法. -不，我不在乎网站上的语法.与营销良好的网站相比，我更喜欢精心设计的解决方案.

I have used git, and I am currently using Hg. I love the Hg source control, but Visual Studio integration is not great, and related task/project management tools have not been great. Plastic SCM was recommended, but I like to get a community view on it. - And no, I don't care about grammar on the website. I prefer well engineered solutions to well marketed websites.

推荐答案

是的，我们已经使用Plastic SCM(5人小组)已有2年了，它的效果很好，每次更新都变得更好！

Yes, we use Plastic SCM (small team of 5) for 2 years already and it works great and even gets better every update!

支持非常好(一个小时内或至少在同一天得到答复！).

Support is very good (within an hour or at least the same day a response!).

分支和合并在实践中也非常好.每个程序员都可以在自己的分支中自行工作(每个任务模式使用分支).这么大的解脱.当您切换到另一个分支时，所有更改都将自动搁置/存储在服务器上.当您切换回去时，更改会被重新加载，这是一个非常不错的功能！您不必担心更改松散，因为Plastic可以很好地处理所有事情.

Also branching and merging works very good in practice. Every programmer can work on it's own in his own branch (using branch per task pattern). Such a big relief. When you switch to another branch all changes are automatically shelved/stored on the server. When you switch back, the changes are reloaded, which is a really nice feature! You don't have to worry to loose changes, because Plastic handles everything very good.

毫无疑问，Plastic SCM是我见过的最好的版本控制系统(用于MS Sourcesafe，CVS，SVN，StarTeam).还听说别人的分支机构支持要比MS Team Foundation好得多.

Without doubt Plastic SCM is the best Version Control System I've ever seen (used MS Sourcesafe, CVS, SVN, StarTeam). Also heard of other's the branch support is much better than MS Team Foundation.

这篇关于塑料SCM.这是正确的解决方案吗?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！