为什么我不能在C ++ 14的lambda中移动std :: unique_ptr? [英] Why can't I move the std::unique_ptr inside lambda in C++14?
问题描述
我想在lambda内部传递一个原始指针,但是如果不调用lambda,我不希望它被泄漏.看起来像这样:
I want to pass a raw pointer inside lambda, but I don't want it to be leaked, if the lambda isn't invoked. It looks like this:
void Clean(std::unique_ptr<int>&& list);
void f(int* list) {
thread_pool.Push([list = std::unique_ptr<int>(list) ] {
Clean(std::move(list)); // <-- here is an error.
});
}
我在Clang 3.7.0中遇到错误:
I get an error in Clang 3.7.0:
错误:将对"unique_ptr< [2 * ...]>"类型的引用绑定到"unique_ptr< [2 * ...]>"类型的值会丢弃限定符
error: binding of reference to type 'unique_ptr<[2 * ...]>' to a value of type 'unique_ptr<[2 * ...]>' drops qualifiers
但是我没有看到任何预选赛,特别是掉线的比赛.
But I don't see any qualifiers at the first place, especially dropped.
此外,我发现了类似的报告在邮件列表中,但没有答案.
Also, I found similar report on the mailing list, but without answer.
我应该如何修改我的代码,使其能够按语义期望地进行编译并正常工作?
How should I modify my code, so it gets compiled and works as expected by semantics?
推荐答案
您需要制作内部lambda mutable
:
You need to make the inner lambda mutable
:
[this](Pointer* list) {
thread_pool.Push([this, list = std::unique_ptr<int>(list) ]() mutable {
^^^^^^^^^
Clean(std::move(list));
});
};
默认情况下,lambdas上的
operator()
是const
,因此您无法在该调用中修改其成员.这样,内部list
的行为就好像它是const std::unique_ptr<int>
一样.当您执行move
强制转换时,它将转换为const std::unique_ptr<int>&&
.这就是为什么出现有关删除限定符的编译错误的原因:您试图将 const 右值引用转换为非常量右值引用.该错误可能没有提供应有的帮助,但最终可以归结为:您不能move
一个const unique_ptr
.
operator()
on lambdas is const
by default, so you cannot modify its members in that call. As such, the internal list
behaves as if it were a const std::unique_ptr<int>
. When you do the move
cast, it gets converted to a const std::unique_ptr<int>&&
. That's why you're getting the compile error about dropping qualifiers: you're trying to convert a const rvalue reference to a non-const rvalue reference. The error may not be as helpful as it could be, but it all boils down to: you can't move
a const unique_ptr
.
mutable
修复了-operator()
不再是const
,因此该问题不再适用.
mutable
fixes that - operator()
is no longer const
, so that issue no longer applies.
注意:如果您的Clean()
使用了unique_ptr<int>
而不是unique_ptr<int>&&
,这更有意义(因为它是更明确的确定性接收器),那么错误将会更加明显:>
Note: if your Clean()
took a unique_ptr<int>
instead of a unique_ptr<int>&&
, which makes more sense (as it's a more explicit, deterministic sink), then the error would have been a lot more obvious:
error: call to deleted constructor of `std::unique_ptr<int>`
note: 'unique_ptr' has been explicitly marked deleted here
unique_ptr(const unique_ptr&) = delete
^
这篇关于为什么我不能在C ++ 14的lambda中移动std :: unique_ptr?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!