Multiindex Pandas Groupby +聚合，保持完整索引 [英] Multiindex pandas groupby + aggregate, keep full index

问题描述

我有一个二级分层索引的整数序列.

I have a two-level hierarchically-indexed sequence of integers.

 >> s
 id1    id2    
 1      a     100
        b      10
        c       9 
 2      a    2000
 3      a       5
        b      10
        c      15
        d      20
 ...

我想按id1分组，然后选择最大值，但结果中要有 full 索引.我尝试了以下方法:

I want to group by id1, and select the maximum value, but have the full index in the result. I have tried the following:

 >> s.groupby(level=0).aggregate(np.max)
 id1              
 1    100 
 2   2000
 3     20

但是结果仅由id1索引.我希望我的输出看起来像这样:

But result is indexed by id1 only. I want my output to look like this:

 id1    id2    
 1      a     100
 2      a    2000
 3      d      20

在此提出了一个相关但更复杂的问题: 多索引熊猫groupby，忽略一个级别吗? 正如它所指出的，答案有点像破解.

A related, but more complicated, question was asked here: Multiindexed Pandas groupby, ignore a level? As it states, the answer is kind of a hack.

有人知道更好的解决方案吗?如果不是，那么id2的每个值都是唯一的特殊情况呢?

Does anyone know a better solution? If not, what about the special case where every value of id2 is unique?

推荐答案

在groupby之后选择完整行的一种方法是使用groupby/transform构建布尔掩码，然后使用掩码从:

One way to select full rows after a groupby is to use groupby/transform to build a boolean mask and then use the mask to select the full rows from s:

In [110]: s[s.groupby(level=0).transform(lambda x: x == x.max()).astype(bool)]
Out[110]: 
id1  id2
1    a       100
2    a      2000
3    d        20
Name: s, dtype: int64

另一种在某些情况下(例如，当有很多组时)更快的方法是将最大值m与s中的值合并到DataFrame中，然后选择行基于m和s之间的相等性:

Another way, which is faster in some cases -- such as when there are a lot of groups -- is to merge the max values m into a DataFrame along with the values in s, and then select rows based on equality between m and s:

def using_merge(s):
    m = s.groupby(level=0).agg(np.max)
    df = s.reset_index(['id2'])
    df['m'] = m
    result = df.loc[df['s']==df['m']]
    del result['m']
    result = result.set_index(['id2'], append=True)
    return result['s']

下面是显示using_merge的示例，虽然更复杂，但可能比using_transform快:

Here is an example showing using_merge, while more complicated, may be faster than using_transform:

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def using_transform(s):
    return s[s.groupby(level=0).transform(lambda x: x == x.max()).astype(bool)]

N = 10**5
id1 = np.random.randint(100, size=N)
id2 = np.random.choice(list('abcd'), size=N)
index = pd.MultiIndex.from_arrays([id1, id2])
ss = pd.Series(np.random.randint(100, size=N), index=index)
ss.index.names = ['id1', 'id2']
ss.name = 's'

---

使用IPython的%timeit函数对这两个函数进行计时会产生:

---

Timing these two functions using IPython's %timeit function yields:

In [121]: %timeit using_merge(ss)
100 loops, best of 3: 12.8 ms per loop

In [122]: %timeit using_transform(ss)
10 loops, best of 3: 45 ms per loop

这篇关于Multiindex Pandas Groupby +聚合，保持完整索引的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！