激活剂与SBT [英] Activator vs sbt

问题描述

我从Play 2.1.1升级到Play 2.3.2.

I upgraded from Play 2.1.1 to Play 2.3.2.

现在Typesafe拥有"Activator"，它结合了其平台的多种产品.

Now Typesafe has "Activator", which combines the several offerings of their platform.

我安装了它的最小"形式，应该仅根据需要下载功能.

I installed the "minimal" form of it, which is supposed to download features only as needed.

然后我想，嘿，这不是构建和依赖管理工具(例如，我不知道，SBT)的意义吗?"

Then I thought, "Hey, isn't that the point of a build and dependency management tools like, I don't know, SBT?"

我发现我可以去我的Play项目并运行

I found that I could just go to my Play project and run

sbt

这与跑步相比有什么大不同吗

Does this do something significantly different than running

activator

(如果我只能使用SBT，我更愿意这样做，因为它具有Debian软件包，而IMO更易于管理.)

(If I could just use SBT, I'd prefer that, since it has a Debian package, which IMO is easier to manage.)

推荐答案

请参见此处-activator-launch.jar文件是带有嵌入式属性文件的sbt启动器.

see here -- the activator-launch.jar file is the sbt launcher with an embedded properties file.

这篇关于激活剂与SBT的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！