关于C ++中的指针和引用的困惑 [英] Confusion about pointers and references in C++
问题描述
我有一堆这样的代码:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void swap(int *a, int *b) {
int temp = *a;
*a = *b;
*b = temp;
}
int main() {
int a;
int b;
a = 7;
b = 5;
swap(a, b);
cout << a << b;
return 0;
}
此代码执行交换过程,就像我要交换2个数字一样
This code does the swapping process as what I exactly wanted to swap 2 numbers
但是当我想要从用户那里获得两个数字时,如下所示;
But when I want two numbers from the user as follows;
int a;
int b;
cin >> a;
cin >> b;
swap(a, b);
cout << a << b;
编译器给我一个关于整数到*整数错误的错误,这是预期的.尽管我没有在&
运算符中使用该方法,但是为什么第一个代码可以正确地进行交换?
The compiler gives me an error about integer to *integer error which is as expected. Why does the first code do the right swapping although I didn't use the method with &
operator?
推荐答案
在第一个示例中,由于您的using namespace std
而调用std::swap
.
第二个示例与第一个示例完全相同,因此您可能没有用.
In the first example, std::swap
is called, because of your using namespace std
.
The second example is exactly the same as the first one, so you might have no using.
无论如何,如果将函数重命名为my_swap
或类似的名称(并更改每次出现的值),则第一个代码将无法正常工作.或者,删除using namespace std
并显式调用std::cin
和std::cout
.我建议第二种选择.
Anyway, if you rename your function to my_swap
or something like that (and change every occurence), then the first code shouldn't work, as expected. Or, remove the using namespace std
and call std::cin
and std::cout
explicitly. I would recommend the second option.
这篇关于关于C ++中的指针和引用的困惑的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!