函数返回一个指向int数组的指针 [英] Function returning a pointer to an int array
问题描述
我正在从Primer 5th Edition学习C ++,我正在将指针返回数组.该函数的声明为:
I am learning C++ from Primer 5th edition and I am at Returning a Pointer to an Array. The declaration of this function is:
int (*func(int i))[10];
,它期望返回一个指向数组的指针.
and it's expected to return a pointer to an array.
我编写了执行此操作的代码:
I wrote code that does this:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int *func(){
static int a[]={1,2,3};
return a;
}
int main (){
int *p=func();
for(int i=0;i!=3;++i){
cout<<*(p+i);
}
}
它正在工作.但是我想知道我在这里所做的与
And it is working. But I want to know the difference between what I made here and
int (*func(int i))[10];
如何使此函数调用起作用,因为在书中没有任何具体示例.
How I can make this function call work, because in the book, there isn't any concrete example.
推荐答案
阅读:什么的sizeof(& array)返回吗?以了解array name
和address of array
之间的差异.
Read: What does sizeof(&array) return? to understand diffrence between array name
and address of array
.
第一季度,我想知道两者之间的区别:
Q1 I want to know the difference between:
在您的代码中:
int *func(){
static int a[]={1,2,3};
return a;
}
您正在返回第一个元素的地址.实际上,a
的类型是int[3]
,它会衰减为int*
.重要的是
您将地址存储在int* p
中,并且可以将数组元素评估为p[i]
.
you are returning address of first element. Actually type of a
is int[3]
that decays into int*
. Important is
You stores address into int* p
and can assess elements of array as p[i]
.
如果您的函数为int int (*func())[3]
,则返回&a
,然后分配给int(*p)[3]
并可以访问(*p)[i]
.
注意:&a
的类型是int(*)[3]
.
Whereas if your function would be int int (*func())[3]
then you return &a
, and assign to int(*p)[3]
and can access (*p)[i]
.
Note: type of &a
is int(*)[3]
.
第二季度,我如何使此函数调用起作用,因为在书中没有任何具体示例.
Q2 How i can make this function call work, because in the book, there isn't any concrete example.
like:
int (*func())[3]{
static int a[]={1,2,3};
return &a;
}
和main():
int main(){
int i=0;
int(*p)[3] = func();
for(i=0; i<3; i++)
printf(" %d\n", (*p)[i]);
return 0;
}
您可以检查工作ID为 Idone
You can check second version of code working id Ideone
第一季度,我想知道两者之间的区别:
Q1 I want to know the difference between:
您有兴趣知道两者之间的区别,因此现在在两种版本的代码中比较p
的两种不同声明:
As you are interested to know diffrence between two so now compare two different declarations of p
in two versions of code:
1): int* p;
,我们将数组元素以p[i]
的形式访问,该元素等于*(p + i)
.
1) : int* p;
and we access array elements as p[i]
that is equals to *(p + i)
.
2): int (*p)[i]
,我们将数组元素以(*p)[i]
的形式访问,该元素等于*((*p) + i)
或只是= *(*p + i)
. (我在*p
周围添加了()
来访问数组元素,因为[]
运算符的优先级高于*
,因此简单的*p[i]
意味着对数组元素的防御).
2) : int (*p)[i]
and we access array elements as (*p)[i]
that is equals to *((*p) + i)
or just = *(*p + i)
. ( I added ()
around *p
to access array element because precedence of []
operator is higher then *
So simple *p[i]
means defense to the array elements).
除返回类型外的其他信息:
An addition information other then return type:
在这两种函数中,我们返回的都是静态变量(数组)的地址,并且静态对象的生命周期直到程序不终止为止.因此,访问数组大号func()
不是问题.
In both kind of functions we returns address that is of a static variable (array), and a static object life is till program not terminates. So access the array outsize func()
is not a problem.
请考虑一下,如果返回的不是静态(且动态分配)的简单数组(或变量)的地址,则会在您的代码中引入未定义行为,从而导致崩溃.
Consider if you returns address of simple array (or variable) that is not static (and dynamically allocated) then it introduce as Undefined behavior in your code that can crash.
这篇关于函数返回一个指向int数组的指针的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!