为什么shell case语句中的第一个模式不能为多重模式? [英] Why can't the first pattern in a shell case statement be a multiple pattern?

查看:110
本文介绍了为什么shell case语句中的第一个模式不能为多重模式?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

case语句的标准说明说: :

The format for the case construct is as follows:

case word in
  [(]pattern1) compound-list;;
  [[(]pattern[ | pattern] ... ) compound-list;;] ...
  [[(]pattern[ | pattern] ... ) compound-list]
esac

The ";;" is optional for the last compound-list.

为什么pattern1也不能成为多重模式?似乎相当武断,尽管我敢肯定它一定不会.

Why can't be pattern1 be a multiple pattern as well? It seems rather arbitrary, though I'm pretty sure it must not be.

谢谢!

推荐答案

我认为您在误解他们在说什么.您链接到的页面上的语法没有这种区别:

I think you're misinterpreting what they're saying. The grammar on the page you link to does not show such a distinction:


case_clause      : Case WORD linebreak in linebreak case_list    Esac
                 | Case WORD linebreak in linebreak case_list_ns Esac
                 | Case WORD linebreak in linebreak              Esac
                 ;
case_list_ns     : case_list case_item_ns
                 |           case_item_ns
                 ;
case_list        : case_list case_item
                 |           case_item
                 ;
case_item_ns     :     pattern ')'               linebreak
                 |     pattern ')' compound_list linebreak
                 | '(' pattern ')'               linebreak
                 | '(' pattern ')' compound_list linebreak
                 ;
case_item        :     pattern ')' linebreak     DSEMI linebreak
                 |     pattern ')' compound_list DSEMI linebreak
                 | '(' pattern ')' linebreak     DSEMI linebreak
                 | '(' pattern ')' compound_list DSEMI linebreak
                 ;
pattern          :             WORD         /* Apply rule 4 */
                 | pattern '|' WORD         /* Do not apply rule 4 */

这篇关于为什么shell case语句中的第一个模式不能为多重模式?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆