Scrum对所有成员都是业余爱好者的团队有效吗？ [英] Is Scrum effective on a team where all of its members are amateurs?

问题描述

我们已经建议在我们的IT项目中使用Scrum，并且顾问会问我们是否适合我们，因为我们仍然是业余爱好者。

We have proposed to use Scrum in our IT Project and our Adviser asks us if it is appropriate to us because we are still amateurs.

是否适合我们

推荐答案

讨论通常是敏捷vs.瀑布，对吗？我正在链接文章，但它是葡萄牙语，所以我将尝试传达其一些想法：

The discussion is usually agile vs. waterfall, right? I am linking an article, but it is in Portuguese, so I'll try to transmit some of its ideas:

瀑布就像国际象棋一样。您进行了很多思考和计划，请尽早预见所有可能的问题。有很多计划，但只有在稳定且知名度很高的领域才有意义，因为在这些领域人们对变更的期望不高。

Waterfall is like chess. You think and plan a lot, try to foresee every possible issue as soon as possible. There's a lot of planning, but makes sense only on stable and well-known domains, where change isn't much expected.

敏捷就像足球（或许多集体体育项目） ）：决策是在游戏中做出的，应该尽快完成。没有太多时间来分析每个结果。对于动态域和不稳定域而言，它是理想的选择，在这些域中总是会发生变化（例如，Web应用程序往往属于此类）。需要注意的另一点是：即使您拥有最好的球员，即使他们的团队表现不佳，您也不会成为赢家。

Agile is like soccer (or many collective sports): decisions are made in-game and should be done fast. There's no much time to analyze every consequence. It is "ideal" for dynamic and unstable domains, where change is always expected (web applications, for instance, tend to fall in this category). Another point to note is: even if you have the best players, if they don't do well as a team, you won't be the winner.

恕我直言， Scrum会很有用，因为：

IMHO, Scrum would be useful, because:

• 每两周一次（或每月一次，具体取决于迭代时间），您将能够看到有什么用？这是非常有价值的，特别是作为一个业余团队，它有望不断学习和发现事物。


• 作为业余爱好者，您可能无法预见一切（这就是敏捷的拥抱）


• 还有更多的共享经验的空间（站立会议，回顾会议甚至计划会议）。而且您会分享实际经验（您必须每周编写代码，而不仅仅是计划）

这篇关于Scrum对所有成员都是业余爱好者的团队有效吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！