gcc编译C ++代码:对`operator new [](unsigned long long)的未定义引用 [英] gcc compiling C++ code: undefined reference to `operator new[](unsigned long long)'

查看:1279
本文介绍了gcc编译C ++代码:对`operator new [](unsigned long long)的未定义引用的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

有一个C ++代码:

  #include< stdio.h> 

int main(){

int b = sizeof(’a’);
if(b == 4)printf(我是C程序!\n);
else printf(我是C ++程序!\n);
}

像这样编译:

  gcc main.cpp -o main 

它成功并给出:

 我是C ++程序! 

然后在函数 main 内的某处添加一行

  int * p1 = new int [1000]; 

失败的原因:

  C:\Users\ ... \AppData\Local\Temp\cccJZ8kN.o:main1.cpp :(。text + 0x1f):未定义对运算符new的引用[] (unsigned long long)'
collect2.exe:错误:ld返回了1个退出状态

然后,以下两个命令成功编译了代码:

  gcc main.cpp -o main -lstdc ++ 

  g ++ main。 cpp -o main 

编译器是minGW-win64( http://mingw-w64.sourceforge.net/ )。



问题是:


  1. 最后两个命令中哪个更好?

  2. 在我看来, gcc 正确选择了正确的编译器,但随后使用了错误的链接器。是吗?

  3. 在minGW-win64中可能会出现问题吗?

我请参阅(如果错了,请纠正我) gcc 旨在成为一个接受输入并决定如何处理输入的主程序。因此,如果没有 -lstdc ++ 可以使用 gcc 。但是,如果不可能,我会更喜欢使用 g ++ ,因为不知道还有什么 gcc 会丢失。 / p>

非常感谢您的考虑

解决方案

gcc 是C程序的GCC编译器驱动程序, g ++ 是用于C ++程序的语言。

除非被覆盖,否则两者都会根据文件扩展名猜测语言。



但是,如果使用错误的驱动程序,则默认选项将是错误的,例如在链接时忽略了用 gcc 编译的C ++程序的C ++标准库。



可以仅添加带有 -lstdc ++ 的库,尽管最好使用适当的驱动程序,因为普通gcc 可能缺少其他更精巧的选项


There's a C++ code:

#include <stdio.h>

int main() {

int b = sizeof('a');
if(b==4) printf("I'm a C program!\n");
else printf("I'm a C++ program!\n");
}

Compile it like this:

gcc main.cpp -o main

It succeeds and gives:

I'm a C++ program!

Then add a line somewhere inside function main

int *p1 = new int [1000];

It fails with:

C:\Users\...\AppData\Local\Temp\cccJZ8kN.o:main1.cpp:(.text+0x1f): undefined reference to operator new[](unsigned long long)'
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Then the following two commands successfully compile the code:

gcc main.cpp -o main -lstdc++

and

g++ main.cpp -o main

The compiler is minGW-win64 (http://mingw-w64.sourceforge.net/).

The questions are:

  1. Which of the two last commands are better?
  2. To my mind gcc correctly chooses the right compiler but then uses a wrong linker. Is it right?
  3. May it be a problem in minGW-win64?

As I see (correct me if it's wrong) gcc was intended to be a main program that takes the input and decides what to do with it. So I'd better use gcc if it worked without -lstdc++. But if it's not possible I'll prefer using g++ instead as don't know what else gcc may miss.

Many thanks for your considerations

解决方案

gcc is the GCC compiler-driver for C programs, g++ is the one for C++ programs.
Both will guess the language on the basis of the file-extension, unless overridden.

But if you use the wrong driver, the default-options will be wrong, like leaving out the C++ standard-library for C++ programs compiled with gcc when linking.

You can add just the library with -lstdc++, though using the proper driver is preferable, as plain gcc may be missing other, subtler options.

这篇关于gcc编译C ++代码:对`operator new [](unsigned long long)的未定义引用的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆