使用std :: is_same,为什么我的函数仍然不能用于2种类型 [英] using std::is_same, why my function still can't work for 2 types

查看:409
本文介绍了使用std :: is_same,为什么我的函数仍然不能用于2种类型的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在尝试编写一个可以同时打印堆栈和队列的函数,我的代码如下

I am trying to write a function that can print both stack and queue, my code is as following

template<typename Cont>
void print_container(Cont& cont){
    while(!cont.empty()){
        if(std::is_same<Cont, stack<int>>::value){
            auto elem = cont.top();
            std::cout << elem << '\n';
        } else {
            auto elem = cont.front();
            std::cout << elem << '\n';
        }
        cont.pop();
        std::cout << elem << '\n';
    }
}

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
    stack<int> stk;
    stk.push(1);
    stk.push(2);
    stk.push(3);
    queue<int> q;
    q.push(1);
    q.push(2);
    q.push(3);

    std::cout << "print stack" << endl;
    print_container(stk);
    std::cout << "print queue" << endl;
    print_container(q);

    return 0;
}

但这在这里不起作用,错误信息是:

demo_typeof.cpp:35:30: error: no member named 'front' in 'std::__1::stack<int, std::__1::deque<int, std::__1::allocator<int> > >'
            auto elem = cont.front();
                        ~~~~ ^
demo_typeof.cpp:52:5: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'print_container<std::__1::stack<int, std::__1::deque<int, std::__1::allocator<int> > > >' requested here
    print_container(stk);
    ^
demo_typeof.cpp:32:30: error: no member named 'top' in 'std::__1::queue<int, std::__1::deque<int, std::__1::allocator<int> > >'
            auto elem = cont.top();
                        ~~~~ ^
demo_typeof.cpp:54:5: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'print_container<std::__1::queue<int, std::__1::deque<int, std::__1::allocator<int> > > >' requested here
    print_container(q);
    ^
2 errors generated.

我知道这是有问题的,并且知道C ++是静态类型的,并且没有太多的运行时支持。但是我想知道为什么它不起作用的具体原因,以及如何处理它。

I know it's problematic, and know C++ is statically typed and without too much Runtime support. but I am wondering the specific reason why this doesn't work, and how to deal with it.

PS:判断容器类型的实际含义是: :您可以通过传递队列容器而不是堆栈来简单地将DFS函数更改为BFS。因此,BFS和DFS可以共享大多数代码。

P.S.: The actual meaning of judge the typing of a container is that: You can simply change a DFS function into BFS by passing a queue container instead of a stack. So, BFS and DFS can share most of the code.

PPS:我在C ++ 11环境中,但也欢迎使用较旧或更高标准的答案。

P.P.S: I am in C++ 11 environment, but answers for older or later standard are also welcomed.

推荐答案

if - else 语句必须是可编译的,这不是您的情况。基于局部专业化的许多可能解决方案之一,甚至可以在C ++ 98中使用。

Both branches of if-else statement must be compilable, which are not in your case. One of many possible solutions that is based on partial specialization and should work even in C++98:

template <typename Cont>
struct element_accessor;

template <typename T>
struct element_accessor<std::stack<T>> {
   const T& operator()(const std::stack<T>& s) const { return s.top(); }
};

template <typename T>
struct element_accessor<std::queue<T>> {
   const T& operator()(const std::queue<T>& q) const { return q.front(); }
};

template<typename Cont>
void print_container(Cont& cont){
   while(!cont.empty()){
      auto elem = element_accessor<Cont>{}(cont);
      std::cout << elem << '\n';
      cont.pop();
   }
}






具有 if constexpr 的C ++ 17解决方案:


A C++17 solution with if constexpr:

template<template<class> typename Cont, typename T>
void print_container(Cont<T>& cont){
   while(!cont.empty()){
      if constexpr (std::is_same_v<Cont<T>, std::stack<T>>) 
         std::cout << cont.top() << '\n';
      else if constexpr (std::is_same_v<Cont<T>, std::queue<T>>) 
         std::cout << cont.front() << '\n';
      cont.pop();
   }
}

这篇关于使用std :: is_same,为什么我的函数仍然不能用于2种类型的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆