在UCM和基本ClearCase之间进行选择 [英] Choosing between UCM and base ClearCase

问题描述

哪个更好？ UCM或基本ClearCase？

Which one is better? UCM or base ClearCase?

对于并行开发，我们需要UCM吗？在基础ClearCase上使用手动分支是否容易出错？

For paralel development, do we need UCM? Is using manual branching is error prone on base ClearCase?

串行开发没有意义吗？

Is serial development not meaningful? working on same branch?

推荐答案

我可以添加...

这实际上取决于从事同一项目的开发团队的规模和复杂程度。例如，我们有一个庞大的开发团队，由来自世界各地的数百名开发人员组成，而该团队确实受益于UCM提供的所有功能（如上文中的VonC大师所述）。

It really depends on the size and complexity of the development team working on the same project. For example, we have a large dev team consisting of 100s of devs from all over the world, and this team really benefits from all the features that UCM provides (as mentioned by master VonC above).

另一方面，我组织中的大多数团队大约有10个人，而且他们都位于同一地点，因此这些团队真的不想搞乱交付和合并，因此他们选择简单地将基本CC与基本分支策略结合使用，例如一个Integration / Release分支，然后是每个发行版的每个dev分支，或一个个人dev分支。对于较小的团队，我们通常建议他们使用基本CC，因为它更易于管理。

On the other hand, most of the teams in my organization are around 10 people, and they are all co-located at one location, and these teams really do not want to mess around with the deliveries and merges, so they choose to simply use base CC with basic branching strategy, e.g. one Integration/Release Branch, followed by each dev branch for each release, or personal dev branch. For smaller teams, we usually recommend them to use base CC because it is easier to manage.

希望这会有所帮助。

这篇关于在UCM和基本ClearCase之间进行选择的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！