什么是deliverbl在UCM ClearCase的？ [英] What is deliverbl in UCM ClearCase?

问题描述

我想知道'deliverbl，是多么重要，他们是历史的目的或开发过程中？我只知道他们是在分娩过程中创建的，包括activies。

I am wondering about 'deliverbl', how important are they for historical purposes or during development? All I know is they are created during delivery and includes activies.

如果我出口的主要基线的ClearCase的不同的供应链管理，我应该考虑'deliverbl作为主要基准？

If i am exporting major baselines from Clearcase to different SCM, should I consider 'deliverbl' as major baseline?

推荐答案

有重新presenting 合并（从孩子流到另一个流），因此：

There are representing merges (from a child stream to another stream), so:

• 他们应该被考虑，因为它们显示了code合并（与潜在的冲突解决）
• 但你可能有更多的麻烦导出合并超链接，显示了的来源的合并的

• they should be considered, as they show the code "merged" (with potential conflicts resolved)
• but you might have more trouble to export the merge hyperlink which shows the source of the merge

我想导出这些基线，因为他们的命名规则说明流目的地名称，还有的交付日期，这样你就只剩下大约两个分支之间的合并线索。

I like to export those baselines because their naming convention shows the stream destination name, as well as the date of the deliver, so you are left with clues about a merge between two branches.

不过，他们都是未标记，所以你可能：

However, their are unlabelled, so you might:

• 要么需要转换这些以一个完整的基线（<一href="http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/cchelp/v7r0m0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.rational.clearcase.cc_ref.doc/topics/ct_chbl.htm"相对=nofollow> cleartool chbl -full ）
• 或决定不打扰他们，离开那些你的出口。

这篇关于什么是deliverbl在UCM ClearCase的？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！