Corda节点之间的信任和协议 [英] Trust and agreement between Corda nodes

问题描述

当联盟中的单个节点或整个联盟中的一个节点运行公证服务时，如何在联盟中的节点之间建立信任？
一个节点如何信任另一节点来运行公证？
如果公证人是第三方，那么财团中的所有节点如何达成协议选择该第三方来运行节点？
谢谢。

When a single node in a consortium or a consortium as a whole runs the notary service, how can trust be established between the nodes in a consortium? How can one node trust the other node to run the notary? In the case, where the notary is a 3rd Party, how does all the nodes in the consortium come to an agreement to choose this 3rd party to run the nodes? Thank you.

推荐答案

通常情况下，没有明确的节点或节点池可以绝对信任运行公证人

It will often be the case that there is no clear node or pool of nodes that can be absolutely trusted to run a notary pool.

在这种情况下，公证池的设置应如下：

In that case, the notary pools should be set up as follows:

• 他们应该运行拜占庭式容错算法。这样可以防止池中的节点恶意给出不良的共识结果


• 它们应在非验证模式下运行。这样可以防止池中的节点看到正在冲突的事务的内容

通过此设置，无需信任

为这些池选择节点将是网络治理的问题。很有可能会向一组标准技术服务提供商收取报酬，以运行BFT，非验证池。

Choosing the nodes for these pools would be a network governance matter. In all likelihood, a pool of standard technology service providers will be paid to run a BFT, non-validating pool.

这篇关于Corda节点之间的信任和协议的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！