使用初始化列表创建单个项目向量 [英] Use initializer list to create single item vector
问题描述
我有一个函数func
,该函数被重载以接受std::vector<Obj>
自变量或Obj
自变量.
I have a function func
which is overloaded to take either a std::vector<Obj>
argument or a Obj
argument.
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
class Obj {
int a = 6;
};
void func(const std::vector<Obj>& a) {
std::cout << "here" << std::endl;
}
void func(const Obj& a) {
std::cout << "there" << std::endl;
}
int main() {
Obj obj, obj2;
func({obj});
func({obj, obj2});
}
实际输出:
there
here
预期输出:
here
here
似乎{obj}
不是初始化矢量,而是初始化一个对象.我猜要初始化的类型有一些优先顺序.如何精确控制它?
It seems {obj}
doesn't initialize a vector, but rather an object. I guess there is some priority order when it comes to which type it initializes. How do I control it precisely?
(使用g ++(Ubuntu 8.3.0-6ubuntu1)8.3.0编译的示例.)
(Examples compiled with g++ (Ubuntu 8.3.0-6ubuntu1) 8.3.0.)
我发现了可能的重复项( c ++ 11 single函数调用中的元素向量初始化),尽管我的问题仍然没有答案:
I found a possible duplicate (c++11 single element vector initialization in a function call), although my question remains unanswered:
我知道{obj}
可以解析为对象,而不是单个元素的向量,并且前者具有优先权.但是,是否可以使用{}
创建单个项目向量(以便foo
解析为std::vector
重载)?我可以显式创建向量,但{}
似乎更好.
I understand that {obj}
can resolve to an object rather a vector of a single element and the former takes priority. But is there a way to use {}
to create a single item vector (so that foo
resolves to the std::vector
overload)? I could create a vector explicitly but {}
seems nicer.
推荐答案
如链接的问题副本(原文)中所述,没有办法强制采用超载的决议,而采用std::initializer_list
.
As mentioned in the linked question duplicate (the original) there is no way to force the resolution in favour of the overload taking std::initializer_list
.
原始签名(使用int
简化):
The original signatures (using int
to simplify):
void func(const std::vector<int> &a);
void func(const int &a);
由于我已经遇到过很多次,所以我通常这样做:
Since I have encountered this many times I typically do this:
func(std::vector<int>{10});
我不知道执行此操作的任何更短方法,因为使用会执行相同操作的实际类型std::initializer_list
更加冗长.但是从总体上讲,这至少使您所做的事情非常清楚,因为{10}
如果不与类型一起使用的话,确实是模棱两可的.
I am not aware of any shorter way of doing this because using actual type std::initializer_list
that would do the same is even more verbose. But on the birght side it at least makes what you are doing perfectly clear since {10}
is really ambiguous if not accompanied with the type.
这篇关于使用初始化列表创建单个项目向量的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!