是什么Startdust和活动之间的区别 [英] What is difference between Startdust and Activity

问题描述

我想选择一个开放的BPMN工具，我的项目，
我发现无限/星尘从Eclipse和Activiti的Apache的。

I'm trying to select an open BPMN tools for my project, I found Infinity/Stardust from Eclipse and Activiti from Apache.

这些是什么BPMN工具之间的分歧/优势？

What are the differences/advantages between these BPMN tools ?

推荐答案

在比较BPMS人们通常需要考虑具体项目的要求和情况。我不能涵盖所有方面，在这里，但让我补充一些想法。

When comparing BPMS one usually needs to consider the particular project requirements and situation. I cannot cover all aspects here, but let me add some thoughts.

活动和星尘之间非常显著的差异肯定是code基地的规模和成熟度。星尘code基地的Activiti的code碱基的5倍以上。根据该星尘队没有编码的5倍效率较低的希望公平的假设，星尘更丰富的功能。

A very significant difference between Activity and Stardust is certainly the size and maturity of the code base. The Stardust code base is more than 5 times the code base of Activiti. Under the hopefully fair assumption that the Stardust team is not coding 5 times less efficiently, Stardust is more feature rich.

从Ohloh（@see https://www.ohloh.net/p/eclipse-stardust和 https://www.ohloh.net/p/activiti ）：

Some statistics from Ohloh (@see https://www.ohloh.net/p/eclipse-stardust and https://www.ohloh.net/p/activiti):

活动已 4,388 提交内容的 79贡献者重新presenting提出的 438155 线$ C的$ C

Activity has had 4,388 commits made by 79 contributors representing 438,155 lines of code

星尘已 8,312 提交内容的 38贡献者重新presenting提出的 2538729 行code

Stardust has had 8,312 commits made by 38 contributors representing 2,538,729 lines of code

活动花了一个估计的116年的努力（COCOMO模型）开始，其第一承诺在2010年6月，其最终结
  最近提交4天前

Activity took an estimated 116 years of effort (COCOMO model) starting with its first commit in June, 2010 ending with its most recent commit 3 days ago

星尘花了一个估计的726年的努力（COCOMO模型）开始，其第一承诺在2011年12月，其最终结
  最近提交8天前

Stardust took an estimated 726 years of effort (COCOMO model) starting with its first commit in December, 2011 ending with its most recent commit 7 days ago

活动有一个长源记录一个codeBase的一个维护
  非常大的开发团队是增加Y-O-Y提交

Activity has a codebase with a long source history maintained by a very large development team with increasing Y-O-Y commits

星尘拥有一支年轻，但确定codeBase的由维护
  非常大的开发团队稳定Y-O-Y提交

Stardust has a young, but established codebase maintained by a very large development team with stable Y-O-Y commits

这两款产品从Java世界的起源。活动似乎保持主要集中于Java社区，有时也定位为BPMS的主要针对Java开发人员。星尘大力投入到互操作性与.NET世界，也将目标瞄准的观众，是不是太熟悉Java，例如与web建模。 （金仕达具有许多.NET的产品，它与商业星尘版本集成）。

Both products originate from the Java world. Activity seems to keep focusing primarily on the Java community and is sometimes positioned as BPMS for primarily for Java developers. Stardust has invested strongly into interoperability with the .NET world and is also targeting an audience that is not too familiar with Java, for instance with the web modeler. (SunGard has a number of .NET products that it integrates with the commercial Stardust version).

活动拥有一支年轻code基地，是专为BPMN2。星尘有一个年满13周岁code碱基，并逐步配套越来越BPMN2元素。

Activity has a young code base and was designed for BPMN2. Stardust has a 13+ years old code base and is gradually supporting more and more BPMN2 elements.

格雷格哈雷的评论是不完全正确。

Greg Harley's comment is not entirely correct.

• 还有星尘的商业产品，无穷流程平台（IPP）。在code碱基是同步的，并定期合并。这两个版本都没有的许可费用。从SunGard公司的支持是可用于商业code基地。在功能和成熟星尘和IPP的条款几乎等同。

• there is still a commercial product of Stardust, the Infinity Process Platform (IPP). the code bases are synchronized and merged regularly. Both version have no license fees. Support from SunGard is available for the commercial code base. In terms of functionality and maturity Stardust and IPP are almost equivalent.

作为启动CARNOT在德国，奥地利和瑞士，并在美洲额外的牵引力有它的主要市场。收购后更名SunGard公司向CARNOT无穷处理平台。因此，它一直是作为一个独立的产品，最近还主持并作为PAAS / SaaS产品。在2007年，Gartner魔力象限SunGard公司中排名第二视力具有较强的执行能力。后来SunGard公司不包括在Gartner的象限了，因为SunGard公司主要提供产品的Finanacial Servcies和能源行业。 IPP被嵌入在60多个SunGard公司的产品在全球拥有数百个安装。

As a startup CARNOT had its primary market in Germany, Austria and Switzerland and additional traction in the Americas. After the acquisition SunGard rebranded CARNOT to Infinity Process Platform. So it has always been available as a standalone product, recently also hosted and as a Paas/Saas offering. In the Gartner Magic Quadrant 2007 SunGard was ranked 2nd in vision with a strong ability to execute. Later SunGard was not included in the Gartner quadrant anymore because SunGard is primarily offering products to the Finanacial Servcies and Energy industry. IPP is embedded in more than 60 SunGard products and has hundreds of installations worldwide.

活动已提交者的不同群体和一个活跃的社区。喜欢的创始人和项目负责人汤姆·Baeyens或来自Camunda一些有实力的贡献者最近离开社区，开始/分叉的新项目。

Activity has a diverse group of committers and an active community. Some strong contributors like the founder and project lead Tom Baeyens or those from Camunda recently left the Community and started/forked new projects.

星尘是在2013年夏季首次发布在Eclipse开普勒发布。因此，到目前为止，它的社区就是在这个时候年轻，不是很潜水员。虽然在过去几个月已经有显著的增长。

Stardust was first release in Summer 2013 in the Eclipse Kepler release. Hence so far its community is young and not very divers at this time. There has been significant growth during the last few months though.

活动是在Apache许可证下。星尘是Eclipse公共许可（EPL）下。

Activity is under the Apache license. Stardust is under the Eclipse Public License (EPL).

这篇关于是什么Startdust和活动之间的区别的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！