std :: cout语句评估顺序 [英] std::cout statements evaluation order

问题描述

pop()函数怎么了，为什么它不能正常工作?

What is wrong with the pop() function why doesn't it work correctly?

class stack{
    int *p, *Cursor;
    int size ;
public:
    stack(int sz) {Cursor = p = new int[size=sz+1];} //consider the stack empty when its size is 1
    ~stack() {delete[] p;} //Cursor and P will be destroyed when the program finishes
    void push(int x) {Cursor+=1; *Cursor=x; size++;}
    int pop() {if(Cursor == p) return -1; int temp = *Cursor; Cursor--; size--; return (temp);}
    bool isEmpty(){return(Cursor == p);}
    bool isFull(){return(Cursor == p+size);}
};

这是我的测试

stack A(3);
    std::cout<<"Empty: "<<A.isEmpty()<<std::endl;
    std::cout<<"Full: "<<A.isFull()<<std::endl;
    A.push(10);
    A.push(20);
    A.push(30);
    std::cout<<std::endl;
    std::cout<<" 1st pop: "<<A.pop()<<std::endl<<" 2nd pop: " <<A.pop()<<std::endl<<" 3rd pop: " <<A.pop()<<std::endl<<" 4th pop: " <<A.pop()<<std::endl;

我得到的输出是:

1st pop: -1
2nd pop: 10
3rd pop: 20
4th pop: 30

我应该得到类似的东西

1st pop: 30
2nd pop: 20
3rd pop: 10
4th pop: -1

问题是我在哪里出错了?

The question is where did I go wrong?

推荐答案

没什么大不了的，但是 pop (如果您使用的话)从右到左进行评估(如果您将它们全部放入)一条 std :: cout 行.一般来说.未指定评估顺序.有关此详细信息，请参见此处.

Nothing did go wrong, but the pops get (in your case) evaluated from right to left if you put them all in one std::cout line. In general. the evaluation order is unspecified. For more detail on this see here.

因此，您可以按相反的顺序正确获取元素，然后按 -1 顺序进行反转打印.

So you correctly get the elements in reverse order of insertion and then -1 and then print them reversed.

这篇关于std :: cout语句评估顺序的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！