G ++ VS英特尔/铛参数传递顺序? [英] g++ vs intel/clang argument passing order?

查看:200
本文介绍了G ++ VS英特尔/铛参数传递顺序?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

考虑以下code( LWS ):

 的#include<&iostream的GT;
#包括LT&;&计时GT;内嵌无效测试(
   常量的std ::时辰:: high_resolution_clock :: time_point&安培;第一,
   常量的std ::时辰:: high_resolution_clock :: time_point&安培;第二)
{
   性病::法院LT&;< first.time_since_epoch()计数()LT;<的std :: ENDL;
   性病::法院LT&;< second.time_since_epoch()计数()LT;<的std :: ENDL;
}INT主(INT ARGC,CHAR *的argv [])
{
   试验(性病::计时:: high_resolution_clock ::现在()
        的std ::时辰:: high_resolution_clock ::现在());
   返回0;
}

您已经跑了好几次因为有时,没有明显的区别。但是,当出现第一第二,结果是下克以下++评估的时间之间的明显差异

  1363376239363175
1363376239363174

和下英特尔和铛以下内容:

  1363376267971435
1363376267971436

这意味着,在G ++中,第二参数先进行计算,并根据英特尔和铿锵的第一参数首先计算。

哪一个根据C ++ 11的标准是真的吗?


解决方案

  

哪一个根据C ++ 11的标准是真的吗?


两者都是允许的。引用标准(§8.3.6):


  

函数参数评估的顺序是unspeci网络版。


Consider the following code (LWS):

#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>

inline void test(
   const std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::time_point& first, 
   const std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::time_point& second)
{
   std::cout << first.time_since_epoch().count() << std::endl;
   std::cout << second.time_since_epoch().count() << std::endl;
}

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
   test(std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now(), 
        std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now());
   return 0;
}

You have to run it several times because sometimes, there is no visible difference. But when there is a visible difference between the time of evaluation of first and second, the result is the following under g++ :

1363376239363175
1363376239363174

and the following under intel and clang :

1363376267971435
1363376267971436

It means that under g++, the second argument is evaluated first, and under intel and clang the first argument is evaluated first.

Which one is true according to the C++11 standard?

解决方案

Which one is true according to the C++11 standard ?

Both are permissible. To quote the standard (§8.3.6):

The order of evaluation of function arguments is unspecified.

这篇关于G ++ VS英特尔/铛参数传递顺序?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆