如何使用VARCHAR ARRAY_AGG()[] [英] How to use array_agg() for varchar[]
问题描述
我对我们的名为 min_crew
数据库具有不同的字符数组,如'{CA,FO,FA}'一栏
。
我在那里我试图让没有成功这些阵列聚集的查询:
AS seids SELECT use.user_sched_id,ARRAY_AGG(se.sched_entry_id)
,ARRAY_AGG(se.min_crew)
从本质上base.sched_entry
LEFT JOIN base.user_sched_entry使用ON se.sched_entry_id = use.sched_entry_id
WHERE se.sched_entry_id = ANY(ARRAY [623,625])
GROUP BY user_sched_id;
这两个623和625具有相同的 use.user_sched_id
,所以结果应该是seids和分组的 min_crew
,但我不断收到此错误:
错误:找不到数组类型的数据类型字符改变[]
块引用>如果我删除code的
ARRAY_AGG(se.min_crew)
部分,我得到一个表格与user_sched_id =返回2131
和seids ='{623,625}
。解决方案标准聚合函数的
ARRAY_AGG()
仅适用于基本类型,而不是数组类型作为输入。
(但的Postgres 9.5 + 有一个<一个href=\"http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/functions-aggregate.html#FUNCTIONS-AGGREGATE-TABLE\"相对=nofollow>的新变种ARRAY_AGG()
的就可以了!)您可以使用自定义聚合函数的
array_agg_mult()
在这个相关答案定义:结果
<一href=\"http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11762398/selecting-data-into-a-postgres-array-format/11763245#11763245\">Selecting数据转换成一个Postgres阵列每一次数据库创建它。然后你的查询可以这样工作的:
AS seids SELECT use.user_sched_id,ARRAY_AGG(se.sched_entry_id)
,array_agg_mult(ARRAY [se.min_crew])作为min_crew_arr
从本质上base.sched_entry
LEFT JOIN base.user_sched_entry使用using(sched_entry_id)
WHERE se.sched_entry_id = ANY(ARRAY [623,625])
GROUP BY user_sched_id;有在链接的答案的详细理由。
盘区必须匹配
在回答您的意见,考虑手册对数组类型的:
多维数组必须为每个维度匹配程度。
如果不匹配导致错误。
块引用>有是周围没有办法,阵列类型不允许在Postgres的这种失配。您的可能的垫您的阵列,NULL值,使所有尺寸都匹配的程度。
不过,我宁愿与
阵列为逗号分隔的列表翻译array_to_string()
此查询的目的和使用的string_agg()
来聚集文本
- preferably用不同的分隔符。在我的例子使用新行:AS seids SELECT use.user_sched_id,ARRAY_AGG(se.sched_entry_id)
,string_agg(array_to_string(se.min_crew,','),E'\\ n')AS min_crews
FROM ...正常化
您可能要考虑正火广告模式开始。通常情况下,你将执行这样一个n:用一个单独的表就像这个例子概括米的关系:结果
<一href=\"http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9789736/how-to-implement-a-many-to-many-relationship-in-postgresql/9790225#9790225\">How实施PostgreSQL中的许多一对多的关系?I have a column in our database called
min_crew
that has varying character arrays such as'{CA, FO, FA}'
.I have a query where I'm trying to get aggregates of these arrays without success:
SELECT use.user_sched_id, array_agg(se.sched_entry_id) AS seids , array_agg(se.min_crew) FROM base.sched_entry se LEFT JOIN base.user_sched_entry use ON se.sched_entry_id = use.sched_entry_id WHERE se.sched_entry_id = ANY(ARRAY[623, 625]) GROUP BY user_sched_id;
Both 623 and 625 have the same
use.user_sched_id
, so the result should be the grouping of the seids and themin_crew
, but I just keep getting this error:ERROR: could not find array type for data type character varying[]
If I remove the
array_agg(se.min_crew)
portion of the code, I do get a table returned with theuser_sched_id = 2131
andseids = '{623, 625}'
.解决方案The standard aggregate function
array_agg()
only works for base types, not array types as input. (But Postgres 9.5+ has a new variant ofarray_agg()
that can!)You could use the custom aggregate function
array_agg_mult()
as defined in this related answer:
Selecting data into a Postgres arrayCreate it once per database. Then your query could work like this:
SELECT use.user_sched_id, array_agg(se.sched_entry_id) AS seids ,array_agg_mult(ARRAY[se.min_crew]) AS min_crew_arr FROM base.sched_entry se LEFT JOIN base.user_sched_entry use USING (sched_entry_id) WHERE se.sched_entry_id = ANY(ARRAY[623, 625]) GROUP BY user_sched_id;
There is a detailed rationale in the linked answer.
Extents have to match
In response to your comment, consider this quote from the manual on array types:
Multidimensional arrays must have matching extents for each dimension. A mismatch causes an error.
There is no way around that, the array type does not allow such a mismatch in Postgres. You could pad your arrays with NULL values so that all dimensions have matching extents.
But I would rather translate the arrays to a comma-separated lists with
array_to_string()
for the purpose of this query and usestring_agg()
to aggregate thetext
- preferably with a different separator. Using a newline in my example:SELECT use.user_sched_id, array_agg(se.sched_entry_id) AS seids ,string_agg(array_to_string(se.min_crew, ','), E'\n') AS min_crews FROM ...
Normalize
You might want to consider normalizing your schema to begin with. Typically, you would implement such an n:m relationship with a separate table like outlined in this example:
How to implement a many-to-many relationship in PostgreSQL?这篇关于如何使用VARCHAR ARRAY_AGG()[]的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!