为什么人们仍在创建 RSS 提要? [英] Why Are People Still Creating RSS Feeds?

问题描述

...而不是使用 Atom 联合格式?

...instead of using the Atom syndication format?

Atom 是一种定义良好的通用 XML 联合格式.RSS 分为四个不同的版本.从我记事起，所有主要的提要阅读器都支持 Atom，那么为什么它的使用没有更普遍?

Atom is a well-defined, general-purpose XML syndication format. RSS is fractured into four different versions. All the major feed readers have supported Atom for as long as I can remember, so why isn't its use more prevalent?

最糟糕的是网站同时提供两种格式的提要 - 有什么意义?！

Worst of all are sites that provide feeds in both formats - what's the point?!

• 更新(8 月 18 日):有趣的是，这个网站本身正在使用 Atom它的提要而不是 RSS.

推荐答案

Atom 创建者不理解(而且 Atom 支持者仍然不理解)的基本问题是 Atom 并没有以某种方式与RSS.有一个想法是 RSS 支离破碎，而 Atom 以某种方式解决了这个问题.但事实并非如此.Atom 只是另一个 RSS 碎片.一个新名称并没有改变这样一个事实，即它只是为了完成同样的工作而竞争的另一个标准，任何竞争标准都足以胜任这项工作.

The fundamental thing that the Atom creators didn't understand (and that the Atom supporters still don't understand), is that Atom isn't somehow separate from RSS. There's this idea that RSS fractured, and that somehow Atom fixes that problem. But it doesn't. Atom is just another RSS splinter. A new name doesn't change the fact that it's just one more standard competing to do the same job, a job for which any of the competing standards are sufficient.

除了一小部分人之外，没有人关心使用哪种标准.他们只是想让它起作用.Atom、RSS 2.0、RSS 1.0、RSS 401(k) 等等.只要它有效，用户就很高兴.不过，RSS品牌"在很大程度上定义了整个提要类别，因此在很少有人确实知道可以选择的情况下，他们会倾向于选择 RSS，因为它有名称".他们也会倾向于选择 RSS 2.0，因为它的数字更大.

No one outside a fairly small group of people care at all which standard is used. They just want it to work. Atom, RSS 2.0, RSS 1.0, RSS 401(k), whatever. As long as it works, the users are happy. The RSS "brand" very much defines the entire feed category, though, so on the rare occasion that someone does know enough to choose, they will tend to choose RSS, because it's got "the name." They will also tend to choose RSS 2.0, because it's got the bigger number.

RSS，尤其是 RSS 2.0，在提要行业"中根深蒂固.Atom 还没有起飞，因为它除了一个新名称之外并没有带来太多.为什么要在 RSS 运行良好的情况下改用它?如果 RSS 就足够了，为什么还要在新项目上使用 Atom?切换到新的 Feed 格式通常意味着要花额外的时间学习新格式.

RSS, and especially RSS 2.0, are very much entrenched in the feed "industry." Atom hasn't taken off because it doesn't bring much except a new name. Why switch away from RSS when it works just fine? And why even bother using Atom on new projects if RSS is sufficient? Switching to a new feed format mostly means extra time spent learning the new format.

如果没有别的，Apple 将 RSS 2.0 独家用于播客意味着 RSS在可预见的未来，2.0 已经到来.

If nothing else Apple's exclusive use of RSS 2.0 for podcasts means that RSS 2.0 is here for the foreseeable future.

这篇关于为什么人们仍在创建 RSS 提要?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！