类似于 ? 的三元运算符: [英] Ternary Operator Similar To ?:
问题描述
我试图避免这样的结构:
I am trying to avoid constructs like this:
val result = this.getClass.getSimpleName
if (result.endsWith("$")) result.init else result
好的,在这个例子中,then
和 else
分支很简单,但你可以想象复杂的分支.我构建了以下内容:
Ok, in this example the then
and else
branch are simple, but you can image complex ones.
I built the following:
object TernaryOp {
class Ternary[T](t: T) {
def is[R](bte: BranchThenElse[T,R]) = if (bte.branch(t)) bte.then(t) else bte.elze(t)
}
class Branch[T](branch: T => Boolean) {
def ?[R] (then: T => R) = new BranchThen(branch,then)
}
class BranchThen[T,R](val branch: T => Boolean, val then: T => R)
class Elze[T,R](elze: T => R) {
def :: (bt: BranchThen[T,R]) = new BranchThenElse(bt.branch,bt.then,elze)
}
class BranchThenElse[T,R](val branch: T => Boolean, val then: T => R, val elze: T => R)
implicit def any2Ternary[T](t: T) = new Ternary(t)
implicit def fct2Branch[T](branch: T => Boolean) = new Branch(branch)
implicit def fct2Elze[T,R](elze: T => R) = new Elze(elze)
}
定义为,我可以将上面的简单示例替换为:
Defined that, I can replace the above simple example with:
this.getClass.getSimpleName is {s: String => s.endsWith("$")} ? {s: String => s.init} :: {s: String => s}
但是我怎样才能摆脱 s: String =>
?我想要这样的东西:
But how can I get rid of the s: String =>
? I want something like that:
this.getClass.getSimpleName is {_.endsWith("$")} ? {_.init} :: {identity}
我猜编译器需要额外的东西来推断类型.
I guess the compiler needs the extra stuff to infer types.
推荐答案
我们可以结合 如何在 Scala 中定义一个保留前导标记的三元运算符? 对 Option 包装值是一种好的模式吗?得到
We can combine How to define a ternary operator in Scala which preserves leading tokens? with the answer to Is Option wrapping a value a good pattern? to get
scala> "Hi".getClass.getSimpleName |> {x => x.endsWith("$") ? x.init | x}
res0: String = String
scala> List.getClass.getSimpleName |> {x => x.endsWith("$") ? x.init | x}
res1: String = List
这是否足以满足您的需求?
Is this adequate for your needs?
这篇关于类似于 ? 的三元运算符:的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!