工作流工具比较? [英] Workflow Tools Comparison?

问题描述

我们非常需要围绕各种流程设计一些工作流程.问题是我们中没有人真正了解任何工作流技术，而且寻找好的数据来比较可用选项既乏味又不完全富有成效.

There is a pretty strong need for us to design some workflows around various processes. The problem is none of us actually know any workflow technology yet, and finding good data to compare the available options has been tedious and not entirely fruitful.

所以我想我会问你们.

我们正在研究的主要技术是 Windows Workflow Foundation 和 eDocs Workflow.还有哪些其他选择?Sharepoint 2007 也有工作流功能，对吧?那只是基于WF吗?

The main technologies we are looking at are Windows Workflow Foundation and eDocs Workflow. What other options are there? Sharepoint 2007 has workflow functionality too, right? Is that just based on WF?

各种技术的优缺点是什么?他们如何比较?

What are the pros and cons of the various technologies? How do they compare?

此外，与 eDocs 工作流类似的管理类型的一个功能是，它为他们提供了一种自己编辑它的方法.我相信 Sharepoint '07 也是如此.是否有其他方法可以通过直接实施 WWF 来实现这一点?

Also, one feature the administrative types like with eDocs Workflow is that it provides a method for them to edit it themselves. I believe Sharepoint '07 does as well. Is there some other way to allow that with a straight WWF implementation?

推荐答案

Sharepoint 和 WF 更像是互补的技术，设计为同一生态系统中的两种不同的工作流创作工具.有一个 Sharepoint 工作流设计器和一个 WF (Windows Workflow Foundation) 工作流设计器.

Sharepoint and WF more like complementary technologies, designed as two different workflow authoring tools in the same ecosystem. There's a Sharepoint workflow designer, and a WF (Windows Workflow Foundation) workflow designer.

Sharepoint 设计器旨在提供类似于 Office 的工作流编辑体验，更易于入门，适用于非技术类型，并自动生成所有网络表单.

The Sharepoint designer is meant to be an Office-like workflow editing experience, easier to get started with, geared for non-technical types, and generates all the web forms automatically.

另一方面，WF"工作流设计器实际上是 Visual Studio 的一个组件(默认情况下 - 正如伯尼所说，您可以重新托管它)，旨在让程序员能够完全自定义工作流，并将其与所需的任何其他代码/系统.通过使用Sharepoint 活动"，以这种方式构建和部署 Sharepoint 站点仍然是可能的，但更加复杂.

The 'WF' workflow designer on the other hand is actually a component of Visual Studio (by default - as Bernie says you can rehost it), and designed to allow programmers to be able to fully customize workflow, and integrate it with any other code/systems desired. Building and deploying sharepoint sites this way is still possible, through the use of 'Sharepoint Activities', but more complex.

如果您采用前一种方法，您可以希望让管理类型进行自己的基本自定义(达到该环境的限制)，而不会造成完全混乱.

If you take the former route, you can hopefully let the administrative types do their own basic customizations (up to the limits of that environment) without causing total chaos.

这篇关于工作流工具比较?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！