Flash Builder 的快速替代品 [英] Fast alternative to Flash Builder
问题描述
我在 Flex 中有一个大型应用程序.我使用 Flash Builder 来开发它.Flash Builder 运行良好，直到我尝试编译我的项目.检查应用程序界面的微小变化需要太多时间.
I have a large application in Flex. I use Flash Builder to develop it. Flash Builder works good, until I attempt to compile my project. It takes too much time to check small changes of application interface.
- 有比 Flash Builder 更快的替代品吗?InelliJ Idea 是否可以更快地编译大型项目?
- 我只需要检查 100 个界面面板中的一个，是否有任何解决方案可以只预览它(除了将应用程序分成更小的模块)?
推荐答案
FDT 和 IntelliJ Idea 都使用 SDK 附带的默认编译器，适用于您使用的 Flex 版本.我会假设 Flash Builder 也这样做，但我目前从未使用过这个产品.我知道 FDT 会通过只编译自上次编译以来发生变化的那些东西来快速编译一个相对较大的程序，这也是 IntelliJ 的一个选项.
FDT and IntelliJ Idea both use the default compiler that is shipped with the SDK for the version of Flex that you use. I would assume that Flash Builder does the same, but I currently have never used this product. I know that FDT will compile a relatively large program quickly by only compiling those thing that have changed since the last compile, which is an option for IntelliJ as well.
在放弃你当前的 IDE 之前，我会检查以确保这不是一个选项，我知道如果我从 FDT 转到 FlashDevelop 或 IntelliJ，IDE 中似乎会出现一些小东西.没有一个是真正的错误，但必须在编译之前处理以保持整洁.
Before abandoning your current IDE I would check to make sure this is not an option in it as well, I know that if I go from FDT to FlashDevelop or IntelliJ there are several little things that seem to show up in the IDE. None are really errors, but have to be taken care of prior to a compile to keep things tidy.
如果您决定必须对 IDE 进行更改，我可以保证上述任何一款都可以作为可靠的软件使用，其中 FDT 是我目前最喜欢的，因为它拥有我最常使用的工具.
If you decide that a change in IDE is a must, I can vouch for any of the above as solid software to work in, with FDT being my current favorite as it has the tools that I use the most.
这篇关于Flash Builder 的快速替代品的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
