Flash Builder的快速替代品 [英] Fast alternative to Flash Builder

查看:349
本文介绍了Flash Builder的快速替代品的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我在Flex中有一个大型应用程序。
我使用Flash Builder开发它。 Flash Builder运行良好,直到我尝试编译我的项目。
检查应用程序界面的微小变化需要花费太多时间。

I have a large application in Flex. I use Flash Builder to develop it. Flash Builder works good, until I attempt to compile my project. It takes too much time to check small changes of application interface.


  1. Flash Builder是否有更快的替代方案? InelliJ Idea是否能更快地编译大型项目?

  2. 我需要检查100个中的一个接口面板,是否有任何解决方案可以预览它(除了将应用程序分成更小的模块) ?


推荐答案

FDT和IntelliJ Idea都使用SDK附带的默认编译器您使用的Flex版本。我认为Flash Builder也是如此,但我目前从未使用过这个产品。我知道FDT将通过编译自上次编译以来已经改变的那些东西来快速编译一个相对较大的程序,这也是IntelliJ的一个选项。

FDT and IntelliJ Idea both use the default compiler that is shipped with the SDK for the version of Flex that you use. I would assume that Flash Builder does the same, but I currently have never used this product. I know that FDT will compile a relatively large program quickly by only compiling those thing that have changed since the last compile, which is an option for IntelliJ as well.

放弃之前你当前的IDE我会检查以确保它不是一个选项,我知道如果我从FDT转到FlashDevelop或IntelliJ,IDE中会出现几个小东西。没有真正的错误,但必须在编译之前处理以保持整洁。

Before abandoning your current IDE I would check to make sure this is not an option in it as well, I know that if I go from FDT to FlashDevelop or IntelliJ there are several little things that seem to show up in the IDE. None are really errors, but have to be taken care of prior to a compile to keep things tidy.

如果您认为必须更改IDE,我可以保证上面的任何一个作为可以使用的固体软件,FDT是我目前最喜欢的,因为它有我最常用的工具。

If you decide that a change in IDE is a must, I can vouch for any of the above as solid software to work in, with FDT being my current favorite as it has the tools that I use the most.

这篇关于Flash Builder的快速替代品的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆