杰克逊 VS.格森 [英] Jackson Vs. Gson

问题描述

在搜索了一些现有的 JSON 库后，我最终得到了这两个:

After searching through some existing libraries for JSON, I have finally ended up with these two:

• 杰克逊
• Google GSon

我有点偏向 GSON，但网上有消息称 GSon 受到某种天体性能的影响问题(截至 2009 年 9 月).

I am a bit partial towards GSON, but word on the net is that GSon suffers from a certain celestial performance issue (as of Sept 2009).

我继续我的比较；与此同时，我正在寻求帮助来下定决心.

I am continuing my comparison; in the meantime, I'm looking for help to make up my mind.

推荐答案

我上周进行了这项研究，最终得到了相同的 2 个库.因为我使用的是 Spring 3(在其默认的 Json 视图中采用 Jackson 'JacksonJsonView') 对我来说做同样的事情更自然.2个lib几乎相同......最后它们只是映射到一个json文件！:)

I did this research the last week and I ended up with the same 2 libraries. As I'm using Spring 3 (that adopts Jackson in its default Json view 'JacksonJsonView') it was more natural for me to do the same. The 2 lib are pretty much the same... at the end they simply map to a json file! :)

无论如何，正如你所说，Jackson 在表现上取得了 +，这对我来说非常重要.从他们的网页可以看出，该项目也非常活跃，这也是一个很好的迹象.

Anyway as you said Jackson has a + in performance and that's very important for me. The project is also quite active as you can see from their web page and that's a very good sign as well.

这篇关于杰克逊 VS.格森的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！