Eclipse、Subclipse 和 Subversive 的 SVN 插件的优缺点是什么? [英] What are the pros and cons of the SVN plugins for Eclipse, Subclipse and Subversive?

问题描述

Eclipse 中的 SVN 分为两大阵营.SVN 开发人员开发了一个名为 Subclipse 的插件.Eclipse 开发人员有一个名为 Subversive 的插件.从广义上讲，他们都做同样的事情.各自的优缺点是什么?

SVN in Eclipse is spread into two camps. The SVN people have developed a plugin called Subclipse. The Eclipse people have a plugin called Subversive. Broadly speaking they both do the same things. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?

推荐答案

两者非常相似，但 Subversive 是eclipse svn 提供者".我主要使用 Subversive，因为它有一些方便的功能:

Both are very similar but Subversive is the "eclipse svn provider". I primarily use Subversive because of a few convenient features:

历史分组

当我浏览一个分支的历史时，而不是只看到每次提交的一堆行时，它可以按今天、星期等对提交进行分组.

When I'm browsing the history of a branch instead of just seeing a bunch of rows for every commit it can group commits by today, week, etc.

主干、分支和标签的映射

Subversive 假定默认的 svn 布局:主干、分支、标签(您可以更改)，因此无论何时您想要标记或分支，只需单击一下并提供标签或分支的名称.

Subversive assumes the default svn layout: trunk, branches, tags (which you can change), so whenever you want to tag or branch it is one click and you provide the name of the tag or branch.

就像我说的，这些都是我觉得很方便的细微差别.两者都与 mylyn 配合得很好，但总的来说，这两个扩展确实没有太大区别.

Like I said these are minor differences that I just find convenient. Both work great with mylyn, but overall there really isn't a whole lot of differences with these two extensions.

虽然与 Subversive 合并很痛苦(还没有尝试过 Subclipse)，但我一直无法成功合并.合并的预览很棒，但它永远不会完成合并，否则会花费很长时间.大多数情况下，我通过命令行完成合并，没有任何问题.

Merging with Subversive is a pain though (haven't tried Subclipse), I've never been able to successfully merge. The preview of the merge is great but it would never complete the merge or it will take way to long. Most of the time I complete merging through the command line without any issues.

这篇关于Eclipse、Subclipse 和 Subversive 的 SVN 插件的优缺点是什么?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！