Eclipse，Subclipse和Subversive的SVN插件的优点和缺点是什么？ [英] What are the pros and cons of the SVN plugins for Eclipse, Subclipse and Subversive?

问题描述

Eclipse中的SVN扩展到两个阵营。 SVN人员开发了一个名为 Subclipse 的插件。 Eclipse人员有一个名为 Subversive 的插件。广义上说，他们都做同样的事情。

解决方案

两者非常相似，但Subversive是eclipse svn提供程序。我主要使用Subversive，因为有一些方便的功能：

分组历史

当我浏览分支的历史记录，而不是每次提交的时候都看到一堆行，它可以在今天，一周等内分组提交。

中继线，分支和标签的映射

Subversive假定默认的svn布局：trunk，branches，tags（可以更改），所以每当你想要标记或分支它是一个点击，你提供标签或分支的名称。

像我说的这些是小的区别，我只是找到方便。两个工作都与mylyn工作很好，但总体来说这两个扩展并不是很大的区别。

与Subversive合并是一种痛苦（没有尝试Subclipse），我从来没有能够成功合并。合并的预览很棒，但永远不会完成合并，否则将会延续。大部分时间我通过命令行完成合并，没有任何问题。

SVN in Eclipse is spread into two camps. The SVN people have developed a plugin called Subclipse. The Eclipse people have a plugin called Subversive. Broadly speaking they both do the same things. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each?

解决方案

Both are very similar but Subversive is the "eclipse svn provider". I primarily use Subversive because of a few convenient features:

Grouping of history

When I'm browsing the history of a branch instead of just seeing a bunch of rows for every commit it can group commits by today, week, etc.

Mapping of trunk, branches, and tags

Subversive assumes the default svn layout: trunk, branches, tags (which you can change), so whenever you want to tag or branch it is one click and you provide the name of the tag or branch.

Like I said these are minor differences that I just find convenient. Both work great with mylyn, but overall there really isn't a whole lot of differences with these two extensions.

Merging with Subversive is a pain though (haven't tried Subclipse), I've never been able to successfully merge. The preview of the merge is great but it would never complete the merge or it will take way to long. Most of the time I complete merging through the command line without any issues.

这篇关于Eclipse，Subclipse和Subversive的SVN插件的优点和缺点是什么？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！