Firebase runloop (3.0.0) 中未捕获的异常 [英] Uncaught exception in Firebase runloop (3.0.0)

查看:20
本文介绍了Firebase runloop (3.0.0) 中未捕获的异常的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我使用的是最新的 firebase(9.0.2):build.gradle:

I'm using the latest firebase(9.0.2): build.gradle:

dependencies {
     ...
     compile "com.google.firebase:firebase-database:9.0.2"
     compile 'com.google.firebase:firebase-auth:9.0.2'
}
apply plugin: 'com.google.gms.google-services'

项目 build.gradle

classpath 'com.google.gms:google-services:3.0.0'

一段时间后,应用程序开始因此异常而崩溃:

And after some time application starts crashing with this Exception:

  Fatal Exception: java.lang.RuntimeException: Uncaught exception in Firebase runloop (3.0.0). Please report to support@firebase.com
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzadp$1$1.run(Unknown Source)
       at android.os.Handler.handleCallback(Handler.java:739)
       at android.os.Handler.dispatchMessage(Handler.java:95)
       at android.os.Looper.loop(Looper.java:135)
       at android.app.ActivityThread.main(ActivityThread.java:5274)
       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java)
       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:372)
       at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit$MethodAndArgsCaller.run(ZygoteInit.java:909)
       at com.android.internal.os.ZygoteInit.main(ZygoteInit.java:704)
Caused by java.lang.AssertionError: hardAssert failed: 
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzaiv.zzb(Unknown Source)
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzaiv.zzaN(Unknown Source)
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzagh.zzb(Unknown Source)
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzagh.<init>(Unknown Source)
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzaga.<init>(Unknown Source)
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzaga.<init>(Unknown Source)
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzadp.zza(Unknown Source)
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzaeu.zzic(Unknown Source)
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzafc.zzRy(Unknown Source)
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzafc.zza(Unknown Source)
       at com.google.android.gms.internal.zzafc$1.run(Unknown Source)
       at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:422)
       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:237)
       at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:152)
       at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:265)
       at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1112)
       at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:587)
       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:818)

在我的应用程序的onCreate中:

in onCreate of Application I have:

@Override
    public void onCreate() {
    ...
    FirebaseDatabase.getInstance().setPersistenceEnabled(true);
}

我们还为 Firebase 创建了从活动(同一进程中的所有活动)/片段调用的单例辅助类:

and also we created singleton helper class for Firebase what called from Activities(all activities in the same process)/Fragments:

 private FirebaseHelper() {
        mFirebaseRef = FirebaseDatabase.getInstance().getReference();
        mFirebaseAuth = FirebaseAuth.getInstance();
        mFirebaseAuth.addAuthStateListener(this);
        authentication();
    }

    public static synchronized FirebaseHelper getInstance() {
        if (mInstance == null || mInstance.getFirebaseRef() == null) {
            mInstance = new FirebaseHelper();
        }
        return mInstance;
    }

图书馆:

dependencies {
    testCompile 'junit:junit:4.12'
    compile('com.crashlytics.sdk.android:crashlytics:2.5.6@aar') {
        transitive = true;
    }
    compile 'com.google.code.gson:gson:2.6.2'
    compile 'com.android.support:support-v4:23.4.0'
    compile 'com.android.support:support-v13:23.4.0'
    compile 'com.android.support:appcompat-v7:23.4.0'
    compile 'com.android.support:design:23.4.0'
    compile 'com.android.support:support-annotations:23.4.0'
    compile 'com.android.support:gridlayout-v7:23.4.0'
    compile 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-base:9.0.2'
    compile 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-maps:9.0.2'
    compile 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-location:9.0.2'
    compile 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-appindexing:9.0.2'
    compile 'com.google.android.gms:play-services-analytics:9.0.2'
    compile 'com.google.firebase:firebase-messaging:9.0.2'
    compile 'com.facebook.android:facebook-android-sdk:4.11.0'
    compile 'de.greenrobot:eventbus:2.4.0'
    compile 'com.amazonaws:aws-android-sdk-core:2.2.12'
    compile 'com.amazonaws:aws-android-sdk-cognito:2.2.12'
    compile 'com.amazonaws:aws-android-sdk-s3:2.2.12'
    compile 'com.android.support:multidex:1.0.1'
    compile 'com.squareup.retrofit2:retrofit:2.0.2'
    compile 'com.squareup.retrofit2:converter-gson:2.0.2'
    compile 'com.squareup.retrofit2:adapter-rxjava:2.0.2'
    compile 'io.reactivex:rxandroid:1.2.0'
    compile 'io.reactivex:rxjava:1.1.5'
    compile 'com.squareup.okhttp3:logging-interceptor:3.3.1'
    compile 'com.github.curioustechizen.android-ago:library:1.3.0'
    compile 'com.cedarsoftware:json-io:4.4.0'
    compile 'com.timehop.stickyheadersrecyclerview:library:0.4.3@aar'
    compile 'joda-time:joda-time:2.9.3'
    compile 'com.facebook.fresco:fresco:0.10.0'
    compile 'com.facebook.fresco:imagepipeline-okhttp3:0.10.0'
    compile 'com.google.firebase:firebase-core:9.0.2'
    compile 'com.google.firebase:firebase-invites:9.0.2'
    compile 'com.google.firebase:firebase-database:9.0.1'
    compile 'com.google.firebase:firebase-auth:9.0.1'
    compile 'com.github.jd-alexander:LikeButton:0.2.0'

    debugCompile 'com.squareup.leakcanary:leakcanary-android:1.4-beta2'
    releaseCompile 'com.squareup.leakcanary:leakcanary-android-no-op:1.4-beta2'
    androidTestCompile 'junit:junit:4.12'
    androidTestCompile 'com.android.support:support-annotations:23.4.0'
    androidTestCompile 'com.android.support.test:runner:0.5'
    androidTestCompile 'com.android.support.test:rules:0.5'
    compile files('libs/core-3.2.1.jar')
}

推荐答案

我们在 9.0.29.2.0 版本上面临同样的问题.经过数小时的调查,我们发现重现此问题的一种方法是使用固定的 endAtstartAt 参数进行查询.让我用示例代码解释一下:

We are facing the same issue on version 9.0.2 and 9.2.0. After many hours of investigation, we found that one way to reproduce this issue is to have a query with fixed endAt and startAt parameters. Let me explain with a sample code:

// Firebase dependencies
compile 'com.google.firebase:firebase-core:9.2.0'
compile 'com.google.firebase:firebase-database:9.2.0'

...

public class MainActivity extends AppCompatActivity {

    private FirebaseDatabase m_Database;
    private static boolean s_persistenceInitialized = false;

    @Override
    protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
        super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
        setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);

        m_Database = FirebaseDatabase.getInstance();

        if (!s_persistenceInitialized) {
            m_Database.setPersistenceEnabled(true);
            s_persistenceInitialized = true;
        }

        m_Database.setLogLevel(Level.DEBUG);
    }

    @Override
    protected void onStart() {
        super.onStart();

        long endAt = 100L; // Fixed value: CRASH on third app restart
    //  long endAt = new Date().getTime(); // Dynamic value: NO CRASH
        getGoal("min_per_day", endAt, "some_uid");
    }

    private void getGoal(String p_goalId, long p_endAt, String p_uid) {
        Query ref = m_Database.getReference("v0/data/meditation/goals").child(p_goalId).child(p_uid)
            .orderByChild("time").endAt(p_endAt).limitToLast(1);

        ref.addValueEventListener(new ValueEventListener() {
            @Override
            public void onDataChange(DataSnapshot dataSnapshot) {
                Log.i("FB", "Snapshot: " + dataSnapshot);
            }

            @Override
            public void onCancelled(DatabaseError error) {
                Log.e("FB", "Error: " + error);
            }
        });
    }
}

所以固定的 endAt 参数会在第三次启动时导致应用程序崩溃.我假设查询被缓存到磁盘,然后如果我们多次从本地缓存重新创建相同的查询(三),那么在某个时候会损坏.另一方面,如果 endAt 不是固定的,例如以毫秒为单位的当前时间,那么一切都按预期进行.这同样适用于 startAt 查询参数.

So the fixed endAt param will crash the app on third start. I assume queries are cached to disk and then corrupted at some point if we recreate the same query from local cache multiple times (three). On the other hand, if endAt is not fixed, for example current time in millis, then everything works as expected. The same applies for startAt query parameter.

这篇关于Firebase runloop (3.0.0) 中未捕获的异常的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆