将枚举类型的值与关联值进行比较时出现编译器错误? [英] Compiler error when comparing values of enum type with associated values?
问题描述
class MyClass
{
enum MyEnum {
case FirstCase
case SecondCase(Int)
case ThirdCase
}
var state:MyEnum!
func myMethod ()
{
if state! == MyEnum.FirstCase {
// Do something
}
}
}
我收到指向 if
语句的编译器错误::
I get the compiler error pointing at the if
statement::
二元运算符=="不能应用于两个MyClass.MyEnum"操作数
Binary operator '==' cannot be applied to two 'MyClass.MyEnum' operands
如果相反,我使用switch
语句,则没有问题:
If instead, I use a switch
statement, there is no problem:
switch state! {
// Also, why do I need `!` if state is already an
// implicitly unwrapped optional? Is it because optionals also
// are internally enums, and the compiler gets confused?
case .FirstCase:
// do something...
default:
// (do nothing)
break
}
然而,switch
语句感觉太冗长了:我只是想为 .FirstCase
做点什么
,别的什么都不做.if
语句更有意义.
However, the switch
statement feels too verbose: I just want to do something
for .FirstCase
, and nothing otherwise. An if
statement makes more sense.
枚举和 ==
是怎么回事?
What's going on with enums and ==
?
这太奇怪了.在确定 switch
版本并转到我的代码的其他(完全不相关)部分后,返回到 if
语句版本(将 force-unwrapped 属性与固定枚举案例)正在编译,没有错误.我只能得出结论,它与解析器中的某些损坏的缓存有关,并且在此过程中被清除了.
This is ultra-weird. After settling for the switch
version and moving on to other (totally unrelated) parts of my code, and coming back, the if
-statement version (comnparing force-unwrapped property against fixed enum case) is compiling with no errors.
I can only conclude that it has something to do with some corrupted cache in the parser that got cleared along the way.
EDIT 2(感谢 @LeoDabus 和 @MartinR):当我为 other 枚举案例(不是我的我比较 - 在这种情况下,.SecondCase).我仍然不明白为什么会特别触发这个编译器错误(不能使用二元运算符 '=='..."),或者这意味着什么.
EDIT 2 (Thanks @LeoDabus and @MartinR): It seems that the error appears when I set an associated value to the other enum case (not the one I am comparing against - in this case, .SecondCase). I still don't understand why that triggers this compiler error in particular ("Can't use binary operator '=='..."), or what that means.
推荐答案
正如你在评论中所说的,你的枚举类型实际上已经关联了值.在这种情况下,枚举类型没有默认的 ==
运算符.
As you said in a comment, your enumeration type actually has associated
values. In that case there is no default ==
operator for the enum type.
但是您甚至可以在 if
语句中使用模式匹配(从 Swift 2 开始):
But you can use pattern matching even in an if
statement (since Swift 2):
class MyClass {
enum MyEnum {
case FirstCase
case SecondCase
case ThirdCase(Int)
}
var state:MyEnum!
func myMethod () {
if case .FirstCase? = state {
}
}
}
这里的 .FirstCase?
是 .Some(MyEnum.FirstCase)
的快捷方式.
Here .FirstCase?
is a shortcut for .Some(MyEnum.FirstCase)
.
在您的 switch 语句中,state
不会自动解包,即使它是一个隐式解包的可选(否则你可以与 nil
不匹配).但是这里可以使用相同的模式:
In your switch-statement, state
is not automatically unwrapped,
even if it is an implicitly unwrapped optional (otherwise you could
not match against nil
). But the same pattern can be used here:
switch state {
case .FirstCase?:
// do something...
default:
break
}
<小时>
更新:从 Swift 4.1 (Xcode 9.3) 开始,编译器可以为具有关联值的枚举合成 Equatable/Hashable 的一致性(如果它们的所有类型都是 Equatable/Hashable).声明一致性就足够了:
Update: As of Swift 4.1 (Xcode 9.3) the compiler can synthesize conformance to Equatable/Hashable for enums with associated values (if all their types are Equatable/Hashable). It suffices to declare the conformance:
class MyClass {
enum MyEnum: Equatable {
case firstCase
case secondCase
case thirdCase(Int)
}
var state:MyEnum!
func myMethod () {
if state == .firstCase {
// ...
}
}
}
这篇关于将枚举类型的值与关联值进行比较时出现编译器错误?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!