计算不同客户之间的常见物品集 [英] Count common sets of items between different customers

查看:14
本文介绍了计算不同客户之间的常见物品集的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有关于客户和他们购买的不同产品的数据:

I have data on customers and the different products they have purchased:

Customer    Product
   1           A
   1           B
   1           C
   2           D
   2           E
   2           F
   3           A
   3           B
   3           D
   4           A
   4           B

我想检查哪些产品组同时出现在不同客户之间.我想获得不同长度的产品组合的数量.例如,产品组合 A 和 B 一起出现在三个不同的客户身上;产品组 A、B 和 C 出现在一个客户身上.对数据中所有 2 个或更多产品的所有不同集合,依此类推.类似的东西:

I would like to check which sets of products that occur together across different customers. I want to get the count for product combinations of different lengths. For example, the product combination A and B together occurs in three different customers; the product group A, B and C occurs in one customer. And so on for all different sets of 2 or more products in the data. Something like:

Product Group    Number
A, B, C             1
D, E, F             1
A, B, D             1
A, B                3

因此,我计算只有产品 A 和 B 的客户(例如客户 4)中的 A、B 组合, A 和B,以及任何其他产品(例如,拥有 A、B 和 C 的客户 1).

Thus, I'm counting the A, B combination in customers who only have product A and B (e.g. customer 4), and in customers who have A and B, but also any other product (e.g. customer 1, who has A, B and C).

有没有人知道如何使用 tidyversebase R 方法来做到这一点?我觉得这应该很简单 - 也许是 pivot_wider 先,然后计数?

Does anyone have any ideas how to do that with either a tidyverse or base R approach? I feel like it ought to be pretty trivial - maybe pivot_wider first, then count?

我找到了这个问答这可以满足我对成对产品的需求,但我还需要计算两个以上产品的组合.

I have found this question and answer that can do what I need for pairs of products, but I need to count combinations also for more products than two.

推荐答案

如果您有可能使用非base 包,您可以使用专用于查找项目集任务的工具: 规则::先验.在较大的数据集上速度要快得多.

If you have the possibility to use a non-base package, you can use a tool dedicated for the task of finding item sets: arules::apriori. It is much faster on larger data sets.

library(arules)

# coerce data frame to binary incidence matrix
# use apriori to get "frequent itemsets"
r = apriori(data = as.matrix(table(dat) > 0),

# set: type of association mined, minimal support needed of an item set, 
# minimal number of items per item set  
            par = list(target = "frequent itemsets",
                       support = 0,
                       minlen = 2))

# coerce itemset to data.frame, select relevant rows and columns 
d = as(r, "data.frame")
d[d$count > 0, c("items", "count")]

#      items count
# 4    {B,C}     1
# 5    {A,C}     1
# 6    {E,F}     1
# 7    {D,E}     1
# 10   {D,F}     1
# 13   {B,D}     1
# 14   {A,D}     1
# 15   {A,B}     3
# 25 {A,B,C}     1
# 26 {D,E,F}     1
# 35 {A,B,D}     1


在更大的数据集上计时:10000 个客户,每个客户最多 6 个产品.apriori 要快得多.

# Unit: milliseconds
#              expr        min        lq       mean     median         uq        max neval
#     f_henrik(dat)   38.95475   39.8621   41.44454   40.67313   41.05565   57.64655    20
#      f_allan(dat) 4578.20595 4622.2363 4664.57187 4654.58713 4679.78119 4924.22537    20
#        f_jay(dat) 2799.10516 2939.9727 2995.90038 2971.24127 2999.82019 3444.70819    20
#     f_uwe_dt(dat) 2943.26219 3007.1212 3028.37550 3027.46511 3060.38380 3076.25664    20
#  f_uwe_dplyr(dat) 6339.03141 6375.7727 6478.77979 6448.56399 6521.54196 6816.09911    20

10000 个客户,每个客户最多 10 个产品.apriori 快几百倍.

10000 customers with up to 10 products each. apriori is several hundred times faster.

# Unit: milliseconds
#             expr         min          lq        mean      median          uq         max neval
#    f_henrik(dat)    58.40093    58.95241    59.71129    59.63988    60.43591    61.21082    20
#       f_jay(dat) 52824.67760 53369.78899 53760.43652 53555.69881 54049.91600 55605.47980    20
#    f_uwe_dt(dat) 22612.87954 22820.12012 22998.85072 22974.32710 23220.00390 23337.22815    20
# f_uwe_dplyr(dat) 26083.20240 26255.88861 26445.49295 26402.67887 26659.81195 27046.83491    20

在更大的数据集上,Allan 的代码对玩具数据给出了警告(In rawToBits(as.raw(x)) : out-of-range values are 0 in coercion to raw),这似乎影响了结果.因此,它不包含在第二个基准测试中.

On the larger data set, Allan's code gave warnings (In rawToBits(as.raw(x)) : out-of-range values treated as 0 in coercion to raw) on the toy data, which seemed to affect the result. Thus, it is not included in the second benchmark.

数据和基准代码:

set.seed(3) 
n_cust = 10000
n_product = sample(2:6, n_cust, replace = TRUE) # 2:10 in second run
dat = data.frame(
  Customer = rep(1:n_cust, n_product),
  Product = unlist(lapply(n_product, function(n) sample(letters[1:6], n)))) # 1:10 in 2nd run

library(microbenchmark)
res = microbenchmark(f_henrik(dat),
                     f_allan(dat),
                     f_jay(dat),
                     f_uwe_dt(dat),
                     f_uwe_dplyr(dat),
                     times = 20L)


检查相等性:


Check for equality:

henrik = f_henrik(dat)
allan = f_allan(dat)
jay = f_jay(dat)
uwe_dt = f_uwe_dt(dat)
uwe_dplyr = f_uwe_dplyr(dat)

# change outputs to common format for comparison
# e.g. string format, column names, order
henrik$items = substr(henrik$items, 2, nchar(henrik$items) - 1)
henrik$items = gsub(",", ", ", henrik$items)

l = list(
  henrik = henrik, allan = allan, jay = jay, uwe_dt = uwe_dt, uwe_dplyr = uwe_dplyr)
l = lapply(l, function(d){
  d = setNames(as.data.frame(d), c("items", "count"))
  d = d[order(d$items), ]
  row.names(d) = NULL
  d
})

all.equal(l[["henrik"]], l[["allan"]])
# TRUE
all.equal(l[["henrik"]], l[["jay"]])
# TRUE
all.equal(l[["henrik"]], l[["uwe_dt"]])
# TRUE
all.equal(l[["henrik"]], l[["uwe_dplyr"]])
# TRUE


功能:


Functions:

f_henrik = function(dat){
  r = apriori(data = as.matrix(table(dat) > 0),
              par = list(target = "frequent itemsets",
                         support = 0,
                         minlen = 2))
  d = as(r, "data.frame")
  d[d$count > 0, c("items", "count")]
}

f_allan = function(dat){
  all_multiples <- function(strings)
  {
    n <- length(strings)
    do.call("c", sapply(1:2^n, function(x) {
      mystrings <- strings[as.character(rawToBits(as.raw(x))[seq(n)]) == "01"]
      if (length(mystrings) > 1) paste(mystrings, collapse = ", ") else NULL
    }))
  }
  dat %>% 
    group_by(Customer) %>% 
    arrange(Product) %>%
    summarize(Product_group = all_multiples(Product)) %>%
    group_by(Product_group) %>%
    count(Product_group)
}

f_jay = function(dat){
  a <- split(dat$Product, dat$Customer)  ## thx to @Henrik
  r <- range(lengths(a))
  pr <- unlist(lapply(r[1]:r[2], function(x) 
    combn(unique(dat$Product), x, list)), recursive=F)
  or <- rowSums(outer(pr, a, Vectorize(function(x, y) all(x %in% y))))
  res <- data.frame(p.group=sapply(pr, toString), number=or)
  res[res$number > 0, ]
}


f_uwe_dt = function(dat){
  setorder(setDT(dat), Customer, Product)
  dat[, .(Product.Group = unlist(lapply(tail(seq(.N), -1L), 
                                        function(m) combn(unique(Product), m, toString, FALSE)))), 
      by = Customer][
        , .N, by = Product.Group]
}

f_uwe_dplyr = function(dat){
  dat %>% 
    arrange(Customer, Product) %>% 
    group_by(Customer) %>% 
    summarise(Product.Group = n() %>% 
                seq() %>% 
                tail(-1L) %>% 
                lapply(function(m) combn(unique(Product), m, toString, FALSE)) %>% 
                unlist()) %>%
    ungroup() %>% 
    count(Product.Group)
}

这篇关于计算不同客户之间的常见物品集的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆