为什么浏览器不使用 SRV 记录? [英] Why do browsers not use SRV records?

问题描述

为什么浏览器不使用 SRV 记录?

Why do browsers not use SRV records?

这似乎是一个最小的工作量，它将使可靠网站的服务器端实现更加简单.

It seems like a minimal amount of work and it will make the server-side implementation of reliable websites much simpler.

例如，您可以指定层级，例如 www.example.com 解析为 1.2.3.4 和 2.3.4.5，并且仅当这两个都不可用时，请尝试 4.5.6.7.

For example, you can specify tiers, such that www.example.com resolves to 1.2.3.4 and 2.3.4.5, and only if neither of those are available, try 4.5.6.7.

SRV 记录已经存在多年......

SRV records have been around for years...

这里有我遗漏的东西吗?

Is there something I'm missing here?

推荐答案

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard 提供以下 经常给出答案.

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard provides the following Frequently Given Answer.

您来到此页面是因为您说了以下类似的话:

You've come to this page because you've said something similar to the following:

SRV 记录支持甚至还没有进入网络浏览器，更不用说不太常见的协议的客户端了.

SRV record support hasn't even made it into web browsers yet, let alone clients of less-common protocols.

这是对此类陈述的常见答案.

This is the Frequently Given Answer to such statements.

这篇关于为什么浏览器不使用 SRV 记录?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！