为什么浏览器不使用SRV记录？ [英] Why do browsers not use SRV records?
问题描述
为什么不浏览器使用SRV记录？
Why do browsers not use SRV records?
这似乎是工作的最小量，这将使服务器端执行可靠的网站要简单得多。
It seems like a minimal amount of work and it will make the server-side implementation of reliable websites much simpler.
例如，您可以指定层，这样www.example.com解析为1.2.3.4 2.3.4.5和，只有当这两个时间都不可用，试着4.5.6.7。
For example, you can specify tiers, such that www.example.com resolves to 1.2.3.4 and 2.3.4.5, and only if neither of those are available, try 4.5.6.7.
SRV记录已经很多年了......
SRV records have been around for years...
有我丢失的东西在这里？
Is there something I'm missing here?
推荐答案
乔纳森·德博伊恩波拉德提供了以下的常见鉴于答。
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard provides the following Frequently Given Answer.
您已经来到这个页面，因为你说过类似下面的内容：
You've come to this page because you've said something similar to the following:
SRV记录支持，甚至还没有把它做成网页浏览器呢，让我们的不太常见的协议，单独的客户端。
SRV record support hasn't even made it into web browsers yet, let alone clients of less-common protocols.
这是由于经常要回答这样的声明。
This is the Frequently Given Answer to such statements.
这篇关于为什么浏览器不使用SRV记录？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
