`fullVisitorId` =>clientId,一对多映射? [英] `fullVisitorId` => clientId, one-to-many mapping?
问题描述
我的印象是 fullVisitorId
只是 clientId 的散列,两者之间应该有一对一的映射.但在这里,我遇到了一种情况,其中很少有 fullVisitorId
映射到两个不同的 client Id
(我们将 GA Client ID 收集到用户范围的自定义维度中)>
这可能吗?在什么情况下?
感谢您对此的任何澄清
干杯!
附上截图
您可能有兴趣阅读 BigQuery 的 Google Analytics 架构.一些相关部分是:
fullVisitorId
:唯一访问者 ID(也称为客户端 ID).visitId
:此会话的标识符.这是通常存储为 _utmb cookie 的值的一部分.这仅对用户而言是唯一的.对于完全唯一的 ID,您应该结合使用 fullVisitorId 和 visitId.
因此客户 ID 和完整访问者 ID 是同义词,如果您想要特定访问的唯一 ID,您应该使用 fullVisitorId
和 visitId
的组合.
I'm under the impression fullVisitorId
being just a hash of clientId, there should be one-to-one mapping between the two. But here, I've a situation where few of the fullVisitorId
are mapped to two different client Id
(we're collecting GA Client ID into User scoped custom dimensions)
Is that possible ? under what circumstances?
Thanks for any clarification on this
Cheers!
[edit: ] attaching screenshot
You may be interested in reading about the Google Analytics schema for BigQuery. Some of the relevant parts are:
fullVisitorId
: The unique visitor ID (also known as client ID).visitId
: An identifier for this session. This is part of the value usually stored as the _utmb cookie. This is only unique to the user. For a completely unique ID, you should use a combination of fullVisitorId and visitId.
So client ID and full visitor ID are synonymous, and if you want a unique ID for a particular visit, you should use a combination of fullVisitorId
and visitId
.
这篇关于`fullVisitorId` =>clientId,一对多映射?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!