`fullVisitorId` => clientId,一对多映射? [英] `fullVisitorId` => clientId, one-to-many mapping?

查看:111
本文介绍了`fullVisitorId` => clientId,一对多映射?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我觉得 fullVisitorId 只是clientId的一个散列,所以这两者之间应该有一对一的映射关系。但是在这里,我遇到了很少 fullVisitorId 映射到两个不同的客户端Id (我们将GA客户端ID收集到用户自定义维度中)



这可能吗?在什么情况下?



感谢您对此进行任何澄清



干杯!



[edit:]附加屏幕截图

解决方案

您可能有兴趣阅读 BigQuery的Google Analytics纲要。一些相关的部分是:


  • fullVisitorId :独特的访客ID称为客户端ID)。

  • visitId :此会话的标识符。这是通常存储为_utmb cookie的值的一部分。这只对用户是唯一的。对于完全唯一的ID,您应该使用fullVisitorId和visitId的组合。


因此,客户端ID和完整访客ID是同义词,如果你想要一个特定访问的唯一ID,你应该使用 fullVisitorId visitId 的组合。


I'm under the impression fullVisitorId being just a hash of clientId, there should be one-to-one mapping between the two. But here, I've a situation where few of the fullVisitorId are mapped to two different client Id (we're collecting GA Client ID into User scoped custom dimensions)

Is that possible ? under what circumstances?

Thanks for any clarification on this

Cheers!

[edit: ] attaching screenshot

解决方案

You may be interested in reading about the Google Analytics schema for BigQuery. Some of the relevant parts are:

  • fullVisitorId: The unique visitor ID (also known as client ID).
  • visitId: An identifier for this session. This is part of the value usually stored as the _utmb cookie. This is only unique to the user. For a completely unique ID, you should use a combination of fullVisitorId and visitId.

So client ID and full visitor ID are synonymous, and if you want a unique ID for a particular visit, you should use a combination of fullVisitorId and visitId.

这篇关于`fullVisitorId` => clientId,一对多映射?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆