是否有一个很好的 Play 替代品可以与 DynamoDB 一起用于 AWS 上的 Web 应用程序? [英] Is there a good alternative to Play that I can use with DynamoDB for a web application on AWS?

问题描述

我正在为最终用户设计一个图像存储应用程序，该应用程序将具有大量 CRUD 类型的功能.我想在 Amazon Web Services (AWS) 上托管应用程序，并且打算使用该游戏！框架、S3 和 NoSQL 数据库.我找不到适用于 Play 的 DynamoDB 适配器！并且读到 MongoDB 和 EC2 不能相处得很好.

I am designing an image store application for end users which will have lots of CRUD type functionality. I want to host the application on Amazon Web Services (AWS) and was going to use the play! framework, S3 and a NoSQL database. I couldn't find a DynamoDB adapter for Play! and read that MongoDB and EC2 don't get along that well together.

是否有可以与 DynamoDB 一起使用的 Play 替代方案?

Is there a good alternative to Play that I can use with DynamoDB?

是否有我应该考虑的替代框架(Play！看起来对我很有吸引力，干净、精简和简单).

Are there alternative frameworks I should consider (Play! looks very attractive to me, clean, lean and simple).

推荐答案

Play 与数据库无关，但它确实支持其他较新的数据存储.Dynamo 太新了，无法直接在 Web 框架中获得太多支持.Play 是一个很好的框架，我个人非常喜欢它.虽然我使用 Play 2.0，但我不建议完全不熟悉 scala 或 FP 的人使用它.他们说你也不需要知道，但在产品更成熟之前，这是一厢情愿的想法.

Play is database agnostic but it does have some support for other less recent data stores. Dynamo is just too new to have much support directly in a web framework. Play is a fine framework and I personally really like it. While I use Play 2.0, I don't recommend it for someone completely unfamiliar with scala or FP. They say you don't need to know either but that is wishful thinking until the product is more mature.

底线是您分别选择您的 Web 框架和数据存储.正确的一个应该可以灵活地支持另一个的许多选项.

The bottom line is you choose your web framework and data store separately. The right one of each should have the flexibility to support many options of the other.

这篇关于是否有一个很好的 Play 替代品可以与 DynamoDB 一起用于 AWS 上的 Web 应用程序?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！