c++ g++ llvm-clang 编译器分析 [英] c++ g++ llvm-clang compiler profiling
问题描述
请注意，我的问题不是:我如何告诉我的编译器在开启分析的情况下进行编译.
Note, my question is not: how do I tell my compiler to compile with profiling on.
我想配置我的编译过程.对于每个文件，我想知道程序的每一行花费了多少时间.
I want to profile my compiles process. For each file, I'd like to know how much time is spent on each line of the program.
我正在处理一个项目，有些文件的编译时间很长，我正在尝试找出原因.
I'm working on a project, some files have huge compile times, I'm trying to figure out why.
有没有办法用 g++ 或 llvm-clang 做到这一点?
Is there anyway to do this with g++ or llvm-clang?
谢谢！
-v -ftime-report 的输出(什么意思)?
Output of -v -ftime-report (what oes it mean)?
下面是解析器"还是扩展"模板的使用?
In the following, is "parser" or "expand" the use of templates?
Execution times (seconds)
callgraph construction: 0.06 ( 2%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.09 ( 2%) wall 3181 kB ( 1%) ggc
callgraph optimization: 0.05 ( 2%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.05 ( 1%) wall 5243 kB ( 2%) ggc
cfg cleanup : 0.02 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.02 ( 0%) wall 11 kB ( 0%) ggc
df live regs : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall 0 kB ( 0%) ggc
df reg dead/unused notes: 0.03 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.03 ( 1%) wall 1993 kB ( 1%) ggc
register information : 0.04 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.04 ( 1%) wall 0 kB ( 0%) ggc
alias analysis : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall 450 kB ( 0%) ggc
rebuild jump labels : 0.03 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.03 ( 1%) wall 0 kB ( 0%) ggc
preprocessing : 0.12 ( 4%) usr 0.06 (12%) sys 1.46 (27%) wall 2752 kB ( 1%) ggc
parser : 0.67 (21%) usr 0.15 (29%) sys 0.89 (16%) wall 91749 kB (36%) ggc
name lookup : 0.15 ( 5%) usr 0.12 (24%) sys 0.24 ( 4%) wall 14384 kB ( 6%) ggc
inline heuristics : 0.03 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.03 ( 1%) wall 0 kB ( 0%) ggc
tree gimplify : 0.06 ( 2%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.09 ( 2%) wall 15992 kB ( 6%) ggc
tree eh : 0.02 ( 1%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.03 ( 1%) wall 4405 kB ( 2%) ggc
tree CFG construction : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.03 ( 1%) wall 6636 kB ( 3%) ggc
tree CFG cleanup : 0.02 ( 1%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.02 ( 0%) wall 15 kB ( 0%) ggc
tree find ref. vars : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall 1870 kB ( 1%) ggc
tree SSA rewrite : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall 2357 kB ( 1%) ggc
tree SSA other : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall 37 kB ( 0%) ggc
tree operand scan : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.04 ( 8%) sys 0.06 ( 1%) wall 6340 kB ( 2%) ggc
tree SSA to normal : 0.05 ( 2%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.05 ( 1%) wall 95 kB ( 0%) ggc
dominance computation : 0.04 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.04 ( 1%) wall 0 kB ( 0%) ggc
expand : 0.60 (18%) usr 0.03 ( 6%) sys 0.71 (13%) wall 45557 kB (18%) ggc
varconst : 0.02 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.02 ( 0%) wall 3532 kB ( 1%) ggc
jump : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall 1745 kB ( 1%) ggc
mode switching : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall 0 kB ( 0%) ggc
integrated RA : 0.35 (11%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.35 ( 6%) wall 5259 kB ( 2%) ggc
reload : 0.29 ( 9%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.31 ( 6%) wall 6490 kB ( 3%) ggc
thread pro- & epilogue: 0.10 ( 3%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.13 ( 2%) wall 4832 kB ( 2%) ggc
final : 0.19 ( 6%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.21 ( 4%) wall 2985 kB ( 1%) ggc
symout : 0.25 ( 8%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.26 ( 5%) wall 27322 kB (11%) ggc
TOTAL : 3.25 0.51 5.49 256741 kB
推荐答案
用 g++ 试试这些命令行选项
Try these command line options with g++
-v -ftime-报告
-v -ftime-report
这应该会为您提供有关编译过程的更多信息.罪魁祸首通常是模板.
That should give you more information on the compiling process. The culprit is usually templates though.
这篇关于c++ g++ llvm-clang 编译器分析的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
