常用于 RTOS 的设计模式 (VXworks) [英] Design patterns commonly used for RTOS (VXworks)

问题描述

Can anyone help me on design patterns commonly used for RTOS?
In VXworks, which pattern is more preferable?

解决方案

Can we ignore the second sentence in your question? It is meaningless, and perhaps points to a misunderstanding of design patterns. The first part is interesting however. That said, I would generalise it to cover real-time systems rather than RTOS.

Many of the most familiar patterns are mechanistic, but in real-time systems higher-level architectural patterns are also important.

Bruce Powell Douglass is probably the foremost author on the subject of patterns for real time systems. If you want a flavour of what he has to say on the subject then read this article on Embedded.com (it is part three of a series of three; be sure to read the first two as well, since they also touch on the subject, (1) (2)). You could also do worst than to visit Embedded.com and enter "design patterns" into the search box, there are a number of articles on specific patterns and general articles on the subject.

While I think you are being far to specific in requesting patterns for "RTOS(VxWorks)", patterns I have used specifically with VxWorks are the Facade and Adapter patterns. Partly to provide an OO API, and also to provide a level of RTOS agnostic abstraction. The resulting classes were then implemented for Segger emBOS (to allow us to run a smaller, lower cost, royalty free RTOS), and both Windows and Linux to allow test, debug and simulation of the code in a richer environment with more powerful tools.

A non-exhaustive list of many patterns is provided on Wikipedia, many of which will be applicable to real-time systems. The listed concurrency patterns are most obviously relevant.

这篇关于常用于 RTOS 的设计模式 (VXworks)的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！