这是Web测试更好？录音播放自动化或编码？ [英] Which is better for web testing? Record-Play automation or coding?

问题描述

我工作的一个新的项目，我想知道哪些自动化工具是最好的使用。我应该记录播放或code？

I am working on a new project and I wanted to know which automation tool is the best to use. Should I record-play or code?

推荐答案

我已经做了很多的硒浏览器自动化软件包，并且我发现记录的再inforces 的现有的应用程序设计，而编码的驱动器的设计灵活，可维护的方向发展。

I've worked a lot with the Selenium browser automation software packages, and I find that recording re-inforces the existing application design, while coding drives the design in a flexible and maintainable direction.

具体来说，我已经找到了实践效果最好是写剧本，你不知道现有的HTML标记说，一个较高的水平，pretending。非常努力地保持脚本的可读性。

Specifically, the practice I've found works best is to write the script a high level, pretending that you have no idea what the existing HTML markup says. Try very hard to keep the script readable.

open /
click "Ask a question"
type title, "What does ?SYNTAX ERROR ON 20 mean?"
type body "This is an example question, asked by an automated testing robot."
click "Ask your question"

如果脚本不运行，不改变脚本 - 更改HTML。添加ID或类或职称的元素所在的剧本告诉你需要他们。这需要一点时间，但它可以确保你的脚本是维护和明显的，它使更多的脚本变得更加容易。

If the script doesn't run, don't change the script -- change the HTML. Add IDs or classes or titles to elements where the script "tells you" it wants them. It takes a little longer, but it ensures that your script is maintainable and obvious, and it makes further scripts much easier.

这篇关于这是Web测试更好？录音播放自动化或编码？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！