硒的webdriver Java框架 - TestNG的JUnit的还是？ [英] Selenium-Webdriver Java Framework - TestNG or JUnit?

问题描述

随着一个基本的疑问，我有<一个href=\"http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12140344/write-testcases-using-pagefactory-selenium-webdriver-advantages\">here(which遗憾的是没有得到太多的关注）我有在preparing一个Java框架硒的webdriver上下文中的另一个基本疑虑。
我不满意这里答案，需要从现实情况下的最佳实践一些优质的咨询服务场景。 （指望SO）

Along with a basic doubt I had here(which unfortunately did not get much attention) I have another basic doubt in context with preparing a Java Framework for Selenium-WebDriver. I am not satisfied with the answers here and need some quality advice on best practices from real world case scenarios. (Counting on SO)

主要的问题是 - 哪一个更适合硒？ TestNG的JUnit的还是？为什么？

The main question is - Which one is better suited for Selenium? TestNG or JUnit? And Why?

我得到了一些基本的差异这里，<一个href=\"http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3767129/i-am-new-to-automated-testing-in-java-which-tool-should-i-$p$pfer-junit-or-test\">here(for自动化但不清楚的答案-all问挑一）等等。寻找一些更多的细节，这将帮助我更好的决定。

I got some basic differences here,here(for Automation but unclear answers -all ask to pick one) and many more. Looking for some more details which will help me decide better.

P.S：我有硒+ JUnit的经验。如果我走一样的路我会后悔？

P.S: I have experience with Selenium+JUnit. Will I regret if I go the same way?

推荐答案

简单使用JUnit与调节与TestNG的 - 这一切

simplicity with JUnit vs. adjustability with TestNG - that's all

首先，这两个工作得非常好。

Firstly, both work quite well.

如果你想缩小你的执行时间，并有足够的时间去找出最佳的配置，我会建议TestNG的。在并行的情况下，这是你的工具。

If you want to scale down your execution time and have enough time to find out the best possible configuration I would recommend TestNG. In case of parallelization that's your tool

如果您preFER自上而下执行的JUnit的朴素是你在找什么。

If you prefer the plainness of a top down execution JUnit is what you're looking for

- 编辑 -

关于JUnit的3

这篇关于硒的webdriver Java框架 - TestNG的JUnit的还是？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！