不同类型的评估关键字VAR [英] Different types evaluated for keyword var

查看:164
本文介绍了不同类型的评估关键字VAR的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有以下的code,旨在推断由编译器分配给 VAR 关键字类型2个街区。

I have following 2 blocks of code which aims to infer the type assigned to var keyword by the compiler.

var b = 0x80000000 - 0x1;
Console.WriteLine("b: {0}", b);
Console.WriteLine("b.GetType()={0}", b.GetType());

uint val1 = 0x80000000;
int val2 = 0x1;
var c = val1 - val2;
Console.WriteLine("c: {0}", c);
Console.WriteLine("c.GetType(): {0}", c.GetType());


输出:

  b: 2147483647                   //Result of UInt32-Int32
                                  //(as compiler assigns datatype in the
                                  //order of int, uint, long and ulong)
  b.GetType()=System.UInt32       //OK

  c: 2147483647                   //Uint32-Int32                               
  c.GetType(): System.Int64       //Not Understood, why not UInt32 ?

如果变种b VARç几乎相同initialization-其中 VARç甚至明确的,那么为什么它会出现意想不到的数据类型System.Int64?

If var b and var c have almost same initialization- where var c is even explicit, then why does it give unexpected data-type System.Int64 ?

推荐答案

由于

变种B = 0x80000000的 - 为0x1;

时,已经计算。通过优化

is already Computed. by Optimizations

var val1 = 0x80000000;
var val2 = 0x1;
var c = val1 - val2;

不计算呢。和编译器猜测, VAL1 val2的可后来改...

is Not computed yet. and compiler guess that the val1 and val2 may be changed later...

const uint val1 = 0x80000000;
const int val2 = 0x1;
var c = val1 - val2;

C UInt32的现在,因为编译器计算它,并知道resault。

c is UInt32 now because compiler compute it and knows the resault.

由于 VAL1 val2的为常数,编译器知道,他们不会得到改变。所以没有必要的Int64 更多

Because val1 and val2 are constant and Compiler knows that they will not get changed. so there is no need for Int64 any more

这篇关于不同类型的评估关键字VAR的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆