C ++类转换为布尔 [英] c++ convert class to boolean

查看:179
本文介绍了C ++类转换为布尔的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

与所有的基本类型C ++的,可以简单地询问:

With all of the fundamental types of C++, one can simply query:

if(varname)

和的类型转换为用于评估一个布尔值。有什么办法来复制一个用户定义的类此功能?我的一个类是由一个整数标识,虽然它有一些其他的成员,我希望能够检查整数设置为NULL,以这样的方式。

and the type is converted to a boolean for evaluation. Is there any way to replicate this functionality in a user-defined class? One of my classes is identified by an integer, although it has a number of other members, and I'd like to be able to check if the integer is set to NULL in such a manner.

感谢。

推荐答案

您可以定义一个用户定义的转换操作符。这必须是一个成员函数,例如:

You can define a user-defined conversion operator. This must be a member function, e.g.:

class MyClass {
  operator int() const
  { return your_number; }
  // other fields
};

您也可以实现运营商布尔。不过,我的强烈建议反对这样做,因为你的类将成为算术前pressions可迅速导致一个烂摊子使用。输入输出流定义,例如,转换为无效* 。您可以在您可以测试布尔,但没有语言的定义隐式转换同样的方式测试无效* 无效* 。另一种方法是定义运营商!与所需的语义。

You can also implement operator bool. However, I would STRONGLY suggest against doing it because your class will become usable in arithmetic expressions which can quickly lead to a mess. IOStreams define, for example, conversion to void*. You can test void* in the same way you can test a bool, but there are no language-defined implicit conversions from void*. Another alternative is to define operator! with the desired semantics.

在短:定义转换操作符STO整数类型(包括布尔)是一个非常糟糕的主意。

In short: defining conversion operator sto integer types (including booleans) is a REALLY bad idea.

这篇关于C ++类转换为布尔的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆