是否有GNU函数getline接口的替代实现？ [英] Are there alternate implementations of GNU getline interface?

问题描述

我目前正在试验采用了复杂的历史来源，也没有明确的许可软件基地。这将是一个大量的工作合理化的东西，在一个固定的许可证释放。

这也是为了运行一个随机unixish平台，只有一些libc中的我们支持有GNU函数getline，但现在的code期望的吧。

有谁知道一个重新实现的 GNU <的code>函数getline 语义下一个限制较少的许可证可用？

编辑：我问，因为谷歌并没有帮助，我想避免写一个，如果可能的（这可能是一个有趣的练习，但它不能物尽其用我的时间。）

要更具体地，所讨论的接口是：

  ssize_t供函数getline（字符** lineptr，为size_t * N，FILE *流）;
 

解决方案

看看保罗谢页面上的用户输入。如果你想知道确切的条款可以通过电子邮件的作者。

The experiment I am currently working uses a software base with a complicated source history and no well defined license. It would be a considerable amount of work to rationalize things and release under a fixed license.

It is also intended to run a a random unixish platform, and only some of the libc's we support have GNU getline, but right now the code expects it.

Does anyone know of a re-implementation of the GNU getline semantics that is available under a less restrictive license?

Edit:: I ask because Google didn't help, and I'd like to avoid writing one if possible (it might be a fun exercise, but it can't be the best use of my time.)

To be more specific, the interface in question is:

ssize_t getline (char **lineptr, size_t *n, FILE *stream);

解决方案

Take a look at Paul Hsieh's page on User Input. You can email the author if you want to know the exact terms.

这篇关于是否有GNU函数getline接口的替代实现？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！