如何便携式是相比的qsort折返qsort_r功能？ [英] How portable is the re-entrant qsort_r function compared to qsort?

问题描述

qsort_r（）是的重入版本的qsort（）这需要一个额外的'咚'的说法并将其传递到比较功能，我想能在移植的C code使用它。 的qsort（）是POSIX和无处不​​在，但 qsort_r（）似乎是一个BSD延伸。作为一个具体的问题，这是否存在，或者在Windows的C运行时等效？

qsort_r() is the re-entrant version of qsort() which takes an additional 'thunk' argument and passes it into the compare function and I'd like to be able to use it in portable C code. qsort() is POSIX and everywhere but qsort_r() seems to be a BSD extension. As a specific question, does this exist or have an equivalent in the Windows C runtime?

推荐答案

我试图写一个例子所示qsort_r / qsort_s（称为sort_r）的一个便携版本。我也把这个code在混帐回购协议（ https://github.com/noporpoise/sort_r ）

I've attempted to write a portable version of qsort_r / qsort_s (called sort_r) shown with an example. I've also put this code in a git repo (https://github.com/noporpoise/sort_r)

struct sort_r_data
{
  void *arg;
  int (*compar)(const void *a1, const void *a2, void *aarg);
};

int sort_r_arg_swap(void *s, const void *aa, const void *bb)
{
  struct sort_r_data *ss = (struct sort_r_data*)s;
  return (ss->compar)(aa, bb, ss->arg);
}

void sort_r(void *base, size_t nel, size_t width,
            int (*compar)(const void *a1, const void *a2, void *aarg), void *arg)
{
  #if (defined _GNU_SOURCE || defined __GNU__ || defined __linux__)

    qsort_r(base, nel, width, compar, arg);

  #elif (defined __APPLE__ || defined __MACH__ || defined __DARWIN__ || \
         defined __FREEBSD__ || defined __BSD__ || \
         defined OpenBSD3_1 || defined OpenBSD3_9)

    struct sort_r_data tmp;
    tmp.arg = arg;
    tmp.compar = compar;
    qsort_r(base, nel, width, &tmp, &sort_r_arg_swap);

  #elif (defined _WIN32 || defined _WIN64 || defined __WINDOWS__)

    struct sort_r_data tmp = {arg, compar};
    qsort_s(*base, nel, width, &sort_r_arg_swap, &tmp);

  #else
    #error Cannot detect operating system
  #endif
}

实例：

#include <stdio.h>

/* comparison function to sort an array of int, inverting a given region
   `arg` should be of type int[2], with the elements
   representing the start and end of the region to invert (inclusive) */
int sort_r_cmp(const void *aa, const void *bb, void *arg)
{
  const int *a = aa, *b = bb, *p = arg;
  int cmp = *a - *b;
  int inv_start = p[0], inv_end = p[1];
  char norm = (*a < inv_start || *a > inv_end || *b < inv_start || *b > inv_end);
  return norm ? cmp : -cmp;
}

int main()
{
  /* sort 1..19, 30..20, 30..100 */
  int arr[18] = {1, 5, 28, 4, 3, 2, 10, 20, 18, 25, 21, 29, 34, 35, 14, 100, 27, 19};
  /* Region to invert: 20-30 (inclusive) */
  int p[] = {20, 30};
  sort_r(arr, 18, sizeof(int), sort_r_cmp, p);

  int i;
  for(i = 0; i < 18; i++) printf(" %i", arr[i]);
  printf("\n");
}

编译/运行/输出：

Compile/run/output:

$ gcc -Wall -Wextra -pedantic -o sort_r sort_r.c
$ ./sort_r
 1 2 3 4 5 10 14 18 19 29 28 27 25 21 20 34 35 100

我已经在Mac和放大器测试; Linux操作系统。如果你发现错误/改进，请更新此code。您可以自由使用这个code，如你所愿。

I've tested on mac & linux. Please update this code if you spot mistakes / improvement. You are free to use this code as you wish.

这篇关于如何便携式是相比的qsort折返qsort_r功能？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！