为什么新的C语言的书籍不能坚持C99标准？ [英] Why do new C books not adhere to the C99 standard?

问题描述

将近关于C编程每一个（相对）的新书我见过似乎并不坚持C99标准，或者它们覆盖它一个额外的篇章。从Java正在添加背景，C99标准做出迁移（当然，还是迁移^^）更容易对我来说，这很可能也适用于其他语言了。

Nearly every (relatively) new book about c programming I've seen doesn't seem to adhere to the C99 standard, or they cover it in an extra chapter. Comming from a Java background, the C99 standard made the migration (well, still migrating ^^) much easier for me, and this probably applies to other languages, too.

好像C99还没有达到大部分的C语言开发呢。但是，为什么？

It seems like C99 hasn't reached most of the C developers yet. But why?

推荐答案

简短的回答：的编译器支持是太缓慢了安装和C语言程序员是谁慢慢改变他们的行为保守很多。

Short answer: compiler support is slow to get installed and c programmers are a conservative lot who change their behavior slowly.

这篇关于为什么新的C语言的书籍不能坚持C99标准？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！