可以字节序位指为了在字节？ [英] Can endianness refer to bits order in a byte?

问题描述

我在读学习的Core Audio：一个动手指南音频节目的Mac和iOS由克里斯·亚当森在一个点笔者介绍大端为：

I'm reading "Learning Core Audio: A Hands-On Guide to Audio Programming for Mac and iOS" by Chris Adamson and at one point the author describes big-endian as:

一个字节或字的高位数值上比较下层更显著

the high bits of a byte or word are numerically more significant than the lower ones.

不过，到现在为止我虽然大小端的问题只适用于字节秩序，而不是位顺序。一个字节有相同的位顺序（从左到右），如果我们谈论的是小端或大端系统不管。我错了吗？是笔者错了吗？还是我误解了他呢？

However, until now I though the problem of big-little endian only applies to byte order and not bit order. One byte has the same bit order (left to right) no matter if we're talking about little endian or big endian systems. Am I wrong? Is the author wrong? Or did I misunderstood his point?

推荐答案

由于不能正常解决单独一个字节中的位，有没有概念位字节顺序一般。

Since you can't normally address the bits within a byte individually, there's no concept of "bit endianness" generally.

这篇关于可以字节序位指为了在字节？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！