哪个草稿最接近C ++ 14标准？ [英] Which draft is closest to the C++14 standard?

问题描述

我看过在各地提到的N3690，N4140和N4296。我猜这是N4140，因为那是在2014年年底发布。N4296似乎有东西，不是在C ++ 14，像折叠表达式。

I've seen N3690, N4140, and N4296 mentioned in various places. I'm guessing it's N4140 because that was released in late 2014. N4296 seems to have stuff that isn't in C++14, like fold expressions.

推荐答案

N3690是C ++ 14的旧委员会草案; （例如，移除< optional> 和< dynarray> ），并且它不应该用于除标准考古学之外的任何东西。

N3690 is an old committee draft for C++14; massive changes have been made since then (e.g., the removal of <optional> and <dynarray>), and it shouldn't be used for anything other than perhaps standard archaeology.

N3936是用于最终投票的版本（以及实际发送的版本是N3937，但差别基本上是一个花哨封面页）。那么，有一些小编辑修复，成为C + +14 IS。

N3936 is the version that's sent out for final balloting (well, the version that's actually sent out is N3937, but the difference is basically a fancy cover page). That, with some minor editorial fixes, became the C++14 IS.

N4140是C ++ 14，N3337是C ++ 11 - C ++ 14加上一些编辑更改。

N4140 is to C++14 what N3337 is to C++11 - C++14 plus some editorial changes.

N4296是后来的工作草案，其中纳入了投票进入标准的额外建议。

N4296 is a later working draft incorporating additional proposals voted into the standard.

这篇关于哪个草稿最接近C ++ 14标准？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！