在C ++中用for(; condition;)替换while(condition)的任何原因? [英] Any reason to replace while(condition) with for(;condition;) in C++?

查看:161
本文介绍了在C ++中用for(; condition;)替换while(condition)的任何原因?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

看起来像

while( condition ) {
    //do stuff
}

完全等同于

for( ; condition; ) {
    //do stuff
}

是否有理由使用后者而不是前者?

Is there any reason to use the latter instead of the former?

推荐答案

没有理由,据我所知。

There's no good reason as far as I know. You're intentionally misleading people by using a for-loop that doesn't increment anything.

更新:

根据OP对该问题的评论,我可以推测你如何在实际代码中看到这样的结构。我已经看过(和使用)这之前:

Based on the OP's comment to the question, I can speculate on how you might see such a construct in real code. I've seen (and used) this before:

lots::of::namespaces::container::iterator iter = foo.begin();
for (; iter != foo.end(); ++iter)
{
    // do stuff
}

但是这是我离开一个for循环。也许你的项目有一个循环,看起来像一次。如果你添加在循环中删除容器元素的代码,你可能必须仔细控制 iter 是否递增。这可能会导致代码看起来像这样:

But that's as far as I'll go with leaving things out of a for-loop. Perhaps your project had a loop that looked like that at one time. If you add code that removes elements of a container in the middle of the loop, you likely have to control carefully how iter is incremented. That could lead to code that looks like this:

for (; iter != foo.end(); )
{
    // do stuff

    if (condition)
    {
        iter = foo.erase(iter);
    }
    else
    {
        ++iter;
    }
}

但是,这不是没有借口,需要将其更改为while循环。

However, that's no excuse for not taking the five seconds needed to change it into a while-loop.

这篇关于在C ++中用for(; condition;)替换while(condition)的任何原因?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆